| Systems Analysis I | ||||||||||||||||
| Fall 2004 | ||||||||||||||||
| Section 1 | Section 2 | Combined | ||||||||||||||
| Student Items | Mean | SD | Min | Max | Count | Mean | SD | Min | Max | Count | Mean | SD | Min | Max | Count | |
| 1 | I am taking this class primarily as a | 1.55 | 0.73 | 1 | 4 | 44 | 1.22 | 0.55 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 1.45 | 0.69 | 1 | 4 | 62 |
| 2 | My class rank is | 2.95 | 0.71 | 2 | 4 | 44 | 3.50 | 0.92 | 2 | 6 | 18 | 3.11 | 0.81 | 2 | 6 | 62 |
| 3 | Amount of work I put into this course was | 2.70 | 0.67 | 1 | 4 | 44 | 2.44 | 0.51 | 2 | 3 | 18 | 2.63 | 0.63 | 1 | 4 | 62 |
| 4 | The grade I expect in this course is | 1.41 | 0.54 | 1 | 3 | 44 | 1.33 | 0.59 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 1.39 | 0.55 | 1 | 3 | 62 |
| 5 | How many classes did you miss? | 1.73 | 0.85 | 1 | 4 | 44 | 1.89 | 0.83 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 1.77 | 0.84 | 1 | 4 | 62 |
| 6 | What is your current KSU GPA? | 2.89 | 1.22 | 1 | 6 | 44 | 2.50 | 1.10 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 2.77 | 1.19 | 1 | 6 | 62 |
| Instructor Items | ||||||||||||||||
| 7 | Course was well organized | 2.05 | 0.61 | 1 | 3 | 44 | 1.94 | 0.54 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 2.02 | 0.59 | 1 | 3 | 62 |
| 8 | Instructor used class time effectively | 2.00 | 0.75 | 1 | 4 | 44 | 1.78 | 0.55 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 1.94 | 0.70 | 1 | 4 | 62 |
| 9 | Instructor gave clear explanations | 2.61 | 0.87 | 1 | 5 | 44 | 2.17 | 0.79 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 2.48 | 0.86 | 1 | 5 | 62 |
| 10 | I learned a great deal from the instructor | 2.48 | 0.73 | 1 | 4 | 44 | 2.17 | 0.71 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 2.39 | 0.73 | 1 | 4 | 62 |
| 11 | Instructor was receptive to questions | 1.84 | 0.99 | 1 | 5 | 44 | 1.50 | 0.51 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 1.74 | 0.89 | 1 | 5 | 62 |
| 12 | Instructor showed respect for students | 1.41 | 0.58 | 1 | 3 | 44 | 1.39 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 1.40 | 0.56 | 1 | 3 | 62 |
| 13 | Instructor was available for consulation | 1.59 | 0.62 | 1 | 3 | 44 | 1.61 | 0.50 | 1 | 2 | 18 | 1.60 | 0.59 | 1 | 3 | 62 |
| 14 | Students were kept informed of their progress | 1.39 | 0.54 | 1 | 3 | 44 | 1.61 | 0.61 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 1.45 | 0.56 | 1 | 3 | 62 |
| 15 | Instuctor simulated independent thinking | 1.73 | 0.66 | 1 | 3 | 44 | 1.78 | 0.55 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 1.74 | 0.63 | 1 | 3 | 62 |
| 16 | Methods of assigning grades was fair | 1.73 | 0.66 | 1 | 3 | 44 | 1.76 | 0.56 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 1.74 | 0.63 | 1 | 3 | 61 |
| 17 | Appropriate number of evaluations of work | 1.73 | 0.59 | 1 | 3 | 44 | 1.78 | 0.65 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 1.74 | 0.60 | 1 | 3 | 62 |
| 18 | Work load was appropriate | 1.95 | 0.75 | 1 | 4 | 44 | 1.89 | 0.58 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 1.94 | 0.70 | 1 | 4 | 62 |
| 19 | Instructor summarized ideas effectively | 2.18 | 0.84 | 1 | 5 | 44 | 1.89 | 0.58 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 2.10 | 0.78 | 1 | 5 | 62 |
| Overall Items | ||||||||||||||||
| 20 | Overall, the instructor's teaching was | 2.11 | 0.87 | 1 | 4 | 44 | 2.06 | 0.73 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 2.10 | 0.82 | 1 | 4 | 62 |
| 21 | Overall, this course was | 2.30 | 0.76 | 1 | 4 | 44 | 2.33 | 0.84 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 2.31 | 0.78 | 1 | 4 | 62 |
| Open Questions | ||||||||||||||||
| Web Rating | How would rate the web portion of this class? | 1.73 | 0.69 | 1 | 3 | 44 | 2.00 | 0.91 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 1.81 | 0.76 | 1 | 4 | 62 |
| Online Quizzes | How effective were the online quizzes? | 1.84 | 0.94 | 1 | 5 | 44 | 1.67 | 0.84 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 1.79 | 0.91 | 1 | 5 | 62 |
| Evaluation Scale | ||||||||||||||||
| 1 | Excellent | |||||||||||||||
| 2 | Very Good | |||||||||||||||
| 3 | Good | |||||||||||||||
| 4 | Fair | |||||||||||||||
| 5 | Poor | |||||||||||||||
| 6 | Very Poor | |||||||||||||||