Information about Class Projects

Much of this course will focus on the development of Earth System Science curricular materials.  

Jump to information about:
   FOSS Deconstruction/Reconstruction
   Activities (Project 1 and Project 2)
   Curriculum Units (CDCU and IDCU)

   Additional General Information

   NEW!   Grading Criteria for Activity 1 and Activity 2

FOSS Deconstruction/Reconstruction

In pairs, students will deconstruct and reconstruct one part of a FOSS investigation of their choosing.  Class time will be available to work on this project, but work outside of class is also expected. 

Presentation:  Each pair of students will have 15 minutes (including time for questions and discussion) to present their reconstructed activity, and the rationale for their reconstruction in class on Feb 15.  The write-up for the reconstruction will be due one week later (Feb 22).    Presentations are not considered a "final" product - students are expected to consider incorporating some of the peer-feedback obtained during these presentations in their final write-ups.  (So allow time for discussion within your 15 minute slot!)

Write-Up:  The write-up for this reconstruction should include:

bullet

A list of materials needed for the activity

bullet

Preparation instructions for the teacher, including notes about skills the students will need to participate in the activity

bullet

A timeline for the activity

bullet

Step-by-step instructions for leading the activity

bullet

One summative assessment instrument, with a grading rubric

bullet

Optional - Extra resources (web, print or broadly available multimedia)

bullet

A separate statement describing the changes you made and the rationale for these particular changes (2 pages max)

Your reconstruction should address the science concepts targeted by the original version of the FOSS activity.  Please note that while your reconstruction should represent a significant change from the original form of the activity, you may opt to retain some of the original portions of the items listed above in your reconstruction - some of the above may therefore duplicate material that is already present in the FOSS Teacher Guide.  Please format the write-up for your reconstruction to be as similar as possible to the organization and "look and feel" of the FOSS Teacher Guides.

Activities (Project 1 and Project 2)

During the first part of the course, students will develop two of the following four types of activities (Project 1 and Project 2)

bullet

Classroom activity
 

bullet

Field activity
 

bullet

Laboratory activity
 

bullet

Web-based activity

Students will develop these activities individually (i.e., not as part of a group), but with feedback from their peers. 

Write-Up: The write-up for each activity should include:

bullet

A statement of objectives of the activity (these summarize the science concepts that should be understood at the conclusion of the activity).

bullet

A list of materials needed for the activity

bullet

Preparation instructions for the teacher, including notes about skills the students will need to participate in the activity

bullet

A timeline for the activity

bullet

Step-by-step instructions for leading the activity

bullet

One summative assessment instrument, with a grading rubric

bullet

Optional - Extra resources (web, print or broadly available multimedia)

Please format the write-up for your activity to be as similar as possible to the organization and "look and feel" of the FOSS Teacher Guides.

Curriculum Units (CDCU and IDCU)

Later in the course, students will develop more extensive curriculum units.  Two of these will be completed, including:

bullet

A collaboratively developed curriculum unit (CDCU, due and presented on April 17)
 

bullet

An individually developed curriculum unit (IDCU, due May 1, with presentations on May 1 and 3)

The individually developed curriculum unit will serve as the final project for the course.  Students must complete all class projects in order to receive a passing grade for the course.

Scope of Each Unit:  Each of these curriculum units should be similar in length and scope to a 3-4 part FOSS investigation.  Each of the curriculum units should include a variety of activities that will be effective for a broad spectrum of students at the targeted grade level.  The unit should be designed so that it can be successfully implemented in a range of "real-world" classroom situations.  Parts of the investigation might include lab investigations, teacher demonstrations, classroom discussions, group work, field excursions to the school grounds, use of computer or web-based activities, etc. 

Write-Up:  The write-up for each of these curriculum units should include:

bullet

A statement of goals and objectives

bullet

A list of the Ohio benchmarks and indicators targeted by the unit

bullet

An overview of the various parts of the unit, including objectives for each part of the unit (you may want to model this after FOSS's "Investigation ... At a Glance" in the Teacher Guide at the beginning of each investigation)

bullet

A timeline for the unit

bullet

A section containing science content background for the teacher (you may use the FOSS Teacher Guides as a model for the length of this section)

bullet

A list of materials needed for each part of the unit

bullet

Preparation instructions for the teacher for each part of the unit, including notes about skills the students will need to participate in the activity

bullet

Step-by-step instructions for leading each part of the unit

bullet

One pre-assessment instrument

bullet

One formative assessment instrument, with a grading rubric (if appropriate)

bullet

One summative assessment instrument, with a grading rubric

bullet

A list of additional resources (web, print or broadly available multimedia)

Please format the write-up for your unit to be as similar as possible to the organization and "look and feel" of the FOSS Teacher Guides.

Additional General Information

Summary Statements and Peer Feedback:  For each project, students will turn in a summary statement, early in the conceptualization phase of the project.  Approximately 1-2 weeks before individually crafted projects are due, at least part of a class period will be devoted to peer feedback.  During these peer feedback sessions, each student will share their ideas about their project with a small group, which is then expected to offer constructive suggestions.  Students will find these peer feedback sessions most helpful if their project is in a relatively advanced phase of development, but still amenable to incorporation of modifications. 

Presentations: Each CDCU and IDCU will be presented to the class after they complete.  Each CDCU group will have 20 minutes on April 17th for their presentation (including time for questions and discussion).  Each student will give a 15 minute presentation (including time for questions and discussion) on their IDCU during the last week of class (May 1 and 3).  A strict time limit will be imposed for each presentation. 

Grading of Collaborative Assignments:  Grades for the CDCU will consist of an individual grade, reflecting the quality of work produced by each student, and a group grade, reflecting the overall quality of the CDCU.  Grades for individual students will be assigned by equally weighting these individual and group assessments.  The instructor will provide an instrument for reporting the individual contributions of each member of the group.

Additional information about the specific requirements for projects will be posted on this page during the semester.

Grading Criteria for Activity 1 and Activity 2

1. Science content, scaffolding, and assessment

bullet

Does the activity convey accurate scientific concepts?

bullet

Could the activity, if implemented as instructed, promote any scientific misconceptions?

bullet

Will prior scaffolding allow students to successfully complete the activity?

bullet

Does the activity include suggestions to teachers for “catch-up” mechanisms which could help students who have difficulty mastering parts of the activity?

bullet

Is the assessment instrument a valid means of gauging understanding of the targeted scientific concept(s)?

2. Adaptability

bullet

Is sufficient instruction provided so that teachers could implement the activity in a (reasonable) diversity of classroom or school environments?

bullet

Is the activity engaging? Would it appeal to students with different learning styles?

bullet

Is there flexibility in the resources or materials needed to complete the activity?

3. Safety and other practical considerations

bullet

Would any part of the activity pose a risk to students or teachers?

bullet

Is the scope of the activity appropriate for the time available?

bullet

Are collaborative elements of the activity (if any) structured so that all students can be on task during the entire activity?

bullet

Does the activity require a reasonable (i.e., not excessive) amount of teacher preparation time?

bullet

Does the activity make use of commonly available materials and resources?

4. Quality of presentation

bullet

Is the activity described in sufficient detail? Are appropriate preparation instructions provided for the teacher?

bullet

Is the write-up of the activity logically organized, well-written and free of errors in grammar and spelling?