Final
Examination
Directions: do all work on the exam itself, answering
the question in the space provided. If
you require extra space, use the back of the exam, indicating that you have done so.
Each problem has the indicated weight. |
Name: |
1-1 |
1-2 |
1-3 |
1-4 |
|
1-5 |
1-6 |
1-7 |
1-8 |
|
2-1 |
2-2 |
3 |
|
1
Any
tax-financed increase in government spending, whether permanent or temporary, will lead to an decrease in consumption demand.
2
There
are no important differences between a policy of maintaining a fixed exchange
rate and using a currency board..
3
If
the government starts increasing the money supply interest rates will fall.
4
To
be effective, Monetary Policy Rules must be well publicized.
5
The
life cycle model of consumption shows that, both in the long run and in the
short run, consumption is proportional to income
6
The
money multiplier measures the impact of an increase in the money supply on the
Y curve.
7
Whether
people work on the short run or long run labor supply curve depends on how long
they have been earning their current wage rate.
8
The
Theory of Real Business Cycles predicts that real wages will decline during a
recession. By the test of “does it fit
the facts” it is inferior to the explanation based on unanticipated inflation.
1
For
each of the following events, what will be the impact on the trade deficit?
Explain your answer. It is not enough
to guess the right answers: you must explain why these are the correct answers.
a)
People
become more confident about the future
b)
A sudden one-year increase in national
productivity.
c)
The
euro falls from 1 €=$1.12 to 1 €=$0.80.
d)
An
increase in the corporate profits tax.
e)
.Workers
change their perception of a decline in the wage
rate. While they used to believe the
decline to be temporary, they now believe it is permanent.
2
The
following table gives data on the assets of three individuals: John Smith, Will
Jones, and Sally Brown, as well as some basic financial data on the
John Smith |
Will Jones |
Sally Brown |
Income
this period of $40,000, and expects to earn $63,000 next period. Smith has assets of $10,000. |
Working
in |
Now
works in |
Series |
Value |
US
Nominal Interest Rate |
5% |
Price
of Gold in |
$200
an ounce |
Price
of Sourdough Bread in |
$2.00
a loaf |
Price
of a 2 bedroom apartment in |
$500
a month |
US
Unemployment Rate |
4.4% |
Canadian
Unemployment Rate |
7.2% |
Canadian
Nominal Interest Rate |
10% |
Price
of Gold in |
$400
(Canadian) an ounce |
Price
of Sourdough Bread in |
$3.00
(Canadian) a loaf |
Price
of a 2 bedroom apartment in |
$800
(Canadian) a month |
·
Using
these data, compute John, Wills, and Sally’s wealth in US dollars. NB This is a two period model..
·
Assuming
that they all have the same preferences, whom would you expect to consume the
most this year? The least? Why?
·
The
Consider an economy
NEUTRAL, where the unemployment rate is running about a percentage point above
the natural rate. The inflation rate is
equal to the expected inflation rate.
Two competing tax plans have been advanced for managing the economy
·
The
first, the SNOW plan calls for eliminating taxes on capital income. Once the SNOW plan is enacted, the government
will be running a balanced budget.
·
The
second plan, DASCHLE, calls for keeping taxes on capital income and raising the
overall tax rate. The extra funds will
be used to provide universal health coverage to residents. (You may assume that government funded health
care will be just as efficient as current health care plans. No person will get better or worse health
care. )
Now
for the questions. In answering this question, remember the old
proverb that well-labeled and well-explained graphs are worth a thousand or
more words.
1.
What
will be the effect of these two plans on GDP, the price level, interest rates
and Unemployment in
the first year?
2.
Advocates
of both plans claim long term benefits in terms of promoting GDP and economic
welfare. While advocates of the DASCHLE
plan claim a benefit of improved health care, I have taken that benefit off the
table for the purposes of this exam, with the assumption that no person will get better or
worse health care. With that caveat,
comment on the competing claims.