Business Conditions
First Midterm Examination
October 13, 1999
Mr. Upton
Directions: Each Problem has
the indicated weight. Work all problems on the exam itself. If necessary, use
the back of the exam sheets, indicating that you have done so.
Name: |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
S |
1. (7 Points). The reason many countries are
poor is because they are denied access to new technology. If they were allowed
to obtain new technology, they would grow and prosper. Explain whether you agree
or disagree with the statement.
Disagree. The factors
causing the lack of technology are internal. Basically, innovation takes place
where there is money to be made; if these countries gave entrepreneurs the
right incentives, development would follow.
2 (7
points). John Smith has a bequest motive, and plans to leave something to his
child Yorick. Indeed John, being a prudent planner, has already set up a trust
fund that automatically goes to Yorick at John's death. Alas, poor Yorick - we
knew him well - loses his job. He suffers a substantial loss of income. Clearly
Yorick will have to reduce his consumption. It is rational for John to show
support for Yorick by reducing his (John's) consumption as well. It would not
be enough simply to give Yorick his trust fund right now. Explain whether
you agree or disagree. (And, to clear the air, responses talking about tax laws
and the legality of dissolving the trust fund before John's death are
non-responsive).
Agree. The budget line for
both John's and Yorick's consumption shifted in when Yorick lost his Job. That
means that both John's and Yorick's consumption should decline. Just giving
Yorick the trust fund would make Yorick no better off; he is going to get that
anyway.
3. (7
points). To a Malthusian, policies that lower a death rate are undesirable
while policies that lower the birth rate are desirable. Explain why you
agree or disagree with this statement.
Agree. Remember the level
of income at which the birth and death rates intersect determines the standard
of living. If the birth rate drops, the standard of living rises; if the death
rate drops, the standard of living drops.
4. (7
points). If there is a one-time increase in the number of effective labor units
per worker, the capital effective labor ratio falls. Since the wage rate
increases and decreases as the capital effective labor ratio increases or
decreases, workers will be made worse off by the new technology. Explain why
you agree or disagree with this statement.
Disagree. The effects on
the wage rate are correct, but the law of diminishing proportions means that
the decline in the wage rate per effective labor unit will be less than the
increase in the number of effective labor units per worker.
5. (7
points). A bright young MBA student who has a lifetime utility function of the
form
U
= log(c1)+ log (c2) + log(c3) +log(c4)
expects to earn $420,000 in
period 2, $600,000 in period 3 and then retire. The discount rate is 100% per
period. Compute consumption over his lifetime.
Period |
Consumption |
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
Answer. Wealth is
$420,000/2 + $600,000/4 = $360,000. Thus consumption in period 1 will be
$90,000; thereafter it will double. Hence the following table gives consumption:
Period |
Consumption |
1 |
90,000 |
2 |
180,000 |
3 |
360,000 |
4 |
720,000 |
6. (15 points). Consider a country Lower
Balderdash, initially exactly like Neutral in all respects. However, beginning in
Year 1, the age at which people begin work is suddenly and permanently lowered
from 20 to 18, resulting in an increase in the labor force.
Complete the following table for Lower Balderdash
(why are some choices boldfaced and some choices left out? Some get extra
credit in grading, others -those omitted from the table - get no credit.
In Year One |
|
In Steady State Equilibrium |
The capital/effective labor ratio is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
The capital/effective labor ratio is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
The wage rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
The wage rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
|
The interest rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
The output per capita is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
The output per capita is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
|
The saving rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
|
The growth rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
Explain Your Answers (Yes, you can get the right
answers and lose points for an inadequate answer. I don't expect a lengthy
answer, but you must provide an explanation.
Answer:
We will start with steady state
equilibrium. This experiment is much like that of 60-65, except that here we
are lengthening the work period. There is less requirement to borrow during the
pre work years, and there are more years to save for retirement. Hence the
saving rate will go down, just the opposite of 60. The lower saving rate means
a lower capital-effective labor ratio, and hence a lower wage rate and a lower
capital rental rate, which means a lower interest rate. It will not mean a
lower level of output per capita, for the labor force has increased. As to the
growth rate, there is no change in the biological interest rate, so there will
be no change in the growth rate.
In year one, the increased labor
force means more output, which means more output per capita. But inasmuch as
the capital stock cannot change, the wage rate and capital effective labor
ratio both fall. To fill in the table:
In Year One |
|
In Steady State Equilibrium |
The capital/effective labor ratio is less than/ Neutral's |
|
The capital/effective labor ratio is less than/ Neutral's |
The wage rate is less than Neutral's |
|
The wage rate is less than Neutral's |
|
|
The interest rate is greater than Neutral's |
The output per capita is less than Neutral's |
|
The output per capita is less than Neutral's |
|
|
The saving rate is less than Neutral's |
|
|
The growth rate is equal to Neutral's |
7.
(15 points). Consider a country Northwest Balderdash initially like Neutral.
Because of prevailing winds, it knows that, a year hence, the volcano that explodes
in Northeast Balderdash will dump a significant amount of rich volcanic ash on
the country. The effect will be that, a year hence, there will be a one-time
increase of about 20% on the capital stock of Northwest Balderdash. Everyone
will find their assets increased by 20%.
Complete the following table for Northwest
Balderdash (why are some choices boldfaced and some choices left out? Some get
extra credit in grading, others -those omitted from the table - get no credit.
In Year One |
|
In Steady State Equilibrium |
The capital/effective labor ratio is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
The capital/effective labor ratio is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
The wage rate per worker is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
The wage rate per worker is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
The capital rental rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
|
|
|
The output per capita is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
The saving rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
The saving rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
|
The growth rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
Explain
Your Answers (Yes, you can get the right answers and lose points for an
inadequate answer. I don't expect a lengthy answer, but you must provide an
explanation. Comments about the likelihood of air currents moving from east to west
will be ignored.
Answer:
First, lets do steady state
equilibrium. The county will find itself exactly like Neutral, but with 20%
more capital than Neutral. This is winner all over again, and all effects will
disappear in steady state. In year one, the notion that there is to be a 20%
increase in productivity comes to late to impact the capital rental rate, the
wage rate, output per capita. But the notion of an extra 20% return on saving
this year acts as a powerful impact on the incentives to save. The saving rate
will be higher. To fill in the table:
In Year One |
|
In Steady State Equilibrium |
The capital/effective labor ratio is equal to Neutral's |
|
The capital/effective labor ratio is equal to Neutral's |
The wage rate per worker is equal to Neutral's |
|
The wage rate is equal to Neutral's |
The capital rental rate is equal to Neutral's |
|
|
|
|
The output per capita is equal to Neutral's |
The saving rate is greater than Neutral's |
|
The saving rate is equal to Neutral's |
|
|
The growth rate is equal to Neutral's |
8. (15
points). Consider Central Balderdash, a country initially exactly like Neutral
in all respects. However in beginning in period 1, there is a period of social
unrest. Each year, riots cause destruction of 2% of the capital stock. These
riots last for five years before peace and tranquility returns to the country.
(You may assume that the riots in year one, say, do not affect production in
year 1, just the amount of capital in year 1 that is also available in year 2,
etc.
Complete the following table for Central
Balderdash (why are some choices boldfaced and some choices left out? Some get
extra credit in grading, others -those omitted from the table - get no credit.
In Year One |
|
In Steady State Equilibrium |
The capital/effective labor ratio is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
The capital/effective labor ratio is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
|
The wage rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
The interest rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
|
The output per capita is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
The output per capita is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
The saving rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
The saving rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
|
|
The growth rate is less than/equal to/greater than Neutral's |
Explain
Your Answers (Yes, you can get the right answers and lose points for an
inadequate answer. I don't expect a lengthy answer, but you must provide an
explanation.
Answer:
Again, lets first do steady state
equilibrium. The riots end after 5 years, so there will surely be no steady
state effect from the riots. All the variables should be the same as in
Neutral. In year one, however, the riots have an impact. While output is the
same, next period's capital rental rate will surely be lower. Normally this
would mean a lower interest rate, but the impact of the extra depreciation will
lead to a jump in the interest rate. To fill in the table:
In Year One |
|
In Steady State Equilibrium |
The capital/effective labor ratio is equal to Neutral's |
|
The capital/effective labor ratio is equal to Neutral's |
|
|
The wage rate is equal to Neutral's |
The interest rate is greater than Neutral's |
|
|
The output per capita is equal to Neutral's |
|
The output per capita is equal to Neutral's |
The saving rate is less than Neutral's |
|
The saving rate is equal to Neutral's |
|
|
The growth rate is equal to Neutral's |
9. (4 Bonus Points) Who won the 1999
Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics? For what? And why is it called the Memorial
Prize?
To quote from the press
release:
The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences has
awarded
the Bank of Sweden Prize in Economic Sciences
in Memory of Alfred Nobel, 1999
to
Professor Robert A.
Mundell, Columbia University, New York, USA
for his analysis of monetary and fiscal policy under different exchange rate
regimes and his analysis of optimum currency areas.
And why the Memorial Prize?
The other prizes were founded by Mr. Nobel. This one was funded about 30 years
ago by the Bank of Sweden (the Swedish equivalent of the Federal Reserve
Board).