Business Conditions
First Midterm Examination
October 14, 1998
Mr. Upton
Directions: Each Problem has the indicated weight. Work all problems on the exam itself. I think I have left adequate space, but if necessary, use the back of the exam sheets, indicating that you have done so.
Name: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. (7 Points). There are times when GDP declines for a year or
so. The most prominent example is 1929-1933, the Great Depression. Perhaps
there is nothing the government can do about these declines, but it is vital
that it keeps national income up during these declines. Explain whether you
agree or disagree with the statement in italics.
Disagree. Income and
Product must be the same. There is a nit about domestic product and national
income, but basically they must be the same.
2 (7 points). I'm not wealthy. I only earn $25,000 a year. It
is true that fifteen years from now I will receive an inheritance of
$10,000,000. Then, I will be wealthy. But now, I am not wealthy. Explain
whether you agree or disagree with this answer.
Disagree. Wealth is the
present value of all current and future income. In my book an inheritance of
$10,000,000 fifteen years from now makes you wealthy. It must be included in
wealth.
3. (10 Points). The United States has had a relatively constant
rate of growth of real GDP since the end of World War II. European countries
initially had high growth rates, but they have recently declined. In other
countries, such as Malaysia, growth rates are very high and continue to be
high.
This is Catch-Up
101. The Europeans have caught up, and hence the decline in their growth rates.
The Malaysians have not yet caught up.
As they catch up,
the growth rate will decline.
(c) Still other countries have had very
low or negative growth rates? Why has this occurred?
They don’t meet
the conditions for catching up. They have problems such as political
instability, non-market economies, and they don't know how to play baseball.
4. (20 points). A bright young MBA student who now has a lifetime utility function of the form
U = log(c1)+ log (c2)
+ log(c3) +log(c4)
expects to earn $400,000 in period 2, $500,000 in period 3 and then retire. He also has student loans to pay back. The payments on these loans will be $50,000 in period 2 and $80,000 in period 3. The discount rate is 100% per period.
Wealth is 400/2 +500/4 -50/2 -80/4 = 280 (I drop
the thousands). Thus c1 = 70
Period |
Consumption |
1 |
70,000 |
2 |
140,000 |
3 |
280,000 |
4 |
560,000 |
This is like getting an additional 80,000 of wealth in period 3. Thus.
Period |
Consumption |
1 |
70,000 |
2 |
140,000 |
3 |
320,000 |
4 |
640,000 |
5. (30 points). Consider two countries, East and West Fuddle, initially exactly like Neutral in all respects. Twin brothers rule the two economies. At a recent family gathering, the two brothers agreed that both of their nations looked unsightly. In particularly a lot of plants looked old and decrepit. Upon returning to their respective kingdoms, the two brothers instructed their Grand Viziers to "do something" about this.
In Year One |
|
In Steady State Equilibrium |
The capital/effective labor ratio is less than Neutral's |
|
The capital/effective labor ratio is equal to Neutral's |
The wage rate is less than Neutral's |
|
The wage rate is equal to Neutral's |
The capital rental rate is greater than Neutral's |
|
The capital rental rate is equal to Neutral's |
The output per capita is less than Neutral's |
|
The output per capita is equal to Neutral's |
The saving rate is greater than Neutral's |
|
The saving rate is equal to Neutral's |
|
|
The growth rate equal to Neutral's |
Explain
your answers:
This
is just Loser in another guise.
In Year One |
|
In Steady State Equilibrium |
The capital/effective labor ratio is equal to Neutral's |
|
The capital/effective labor ratio is less than Neutral's |
The wage rate is equal to Neutral's |
|
The wage rate is less than Neutral's |
The capital rental rate is equal to Neutral's |
|
The capital rental rate is greater than Neutral's |
The output per capita is equal to Neutral's s |
|
The output per capita is less than Neutral's |
The saving rate is less than Neutral's |
|
The saving rate is less than Neutral's |
|
|
The growth rate is equal to Neutral's |
Explain your answers:
Here, there is a permanent
effect on investment. The saving rate will drop given the lower return. However
the effects on wage rate, etc, will not be felt the first year.
Neutral is best. Both East
and West Fuddle follow foolish policies of needless destruction of the capital
stock. As to a comparison of East and West Fuddle, it depends on your
preferences for consumption now versus consumption later.
6.
(6 points) The Monty Python Book of international economic data report the
following data on Wurstphalia for 1997.
Item |
Amount |
Bushels of Corn Raised |
50,000 |
Price of Corn |
$5
per bushel |
Number of hogs raised |
10,000 |
Price of Hogs |
$30 |
Corn consumed by each hog |
3
bushels |
No other goods and services were
produced in Wurstphalia. What was Wurstphalia's GDP? Explain your answer.
$400,000. Do not make the
mistake of counting the intermediate productin of corn consumed by the hogs.
7. (Bonus Points)
(a) Two points. Who won the
1998 Nobel Prize in Economics?
(b) Three points. For what?
You can go to the web for
this one.