Managerial
Economics
Mr.
Upton
Spring,
2000
First Midterm
Examination
February 29, 2000
Take the political scientist at his word. Draw indifference curves for John McCain and George Bush for the number of votes each gets. Label your axes clearly. Defend your answers. WARNING. These indifference curves are not exactly standard. Don’t draw them blindly. Think through the problem.
The following graph illustrates the two
cases. The first panel illustrates
Bush’s preferences; the second panel, McCain’s. To illustrate Bush’s preferences, I have drawn a 45-degree
line. Bush wants to be above that
line. Any point above that line is
preferable to any point below that line.
The indifference curves are not standard. John McCain’s preferences are more perhaps more standard. I have drawn three indifference curves. One, the 45 degree line going through the
origin is labeled B = M, corresponding to Bush and McCain getting an equal
number of votes. This corresponds to a
tie and is certainly an indifference curve.
The line B=M+1 corresponds to Bush beating McCain by one vote and lower
level of utility for McCain. The line
B=M-1 corresponds to a one vote McCain victory and, of the three indifference
curves drawn the highest level of utility for Senator McCain. You can draw other indifference curves but
these three give the general picture.
Directions: Work any two (2) of the following three (3)
questions. In the boxes below, check
which problems you have worked: If you
do not check the boxes, I will assume you want to work problems 1 and 2.
I
have worked(Check 2) |
|
Problem 1 |
|
Problem 2 |
|
Problem 3 |
|
1. The demand functions for two products A and B are:
PA = 40 - (0.05)QA
QB = 800 - 20PB
For each demand function,
(a) compute the point price elasticity (h) at P = 20.
These
are really the same demand functions, as you can see by reversing the first
equation and putting QA on the left-hand side. When P = 20, Q = 400, and Delta Q/Delta P =
-20. Thus the elasticity is given by
h
= (P/Q)(Delta Q/Delta P ) =
(20/400)(-20) = -1
(b) compute the arc price elasticity when the price changes from P =15 to P = 25.
The
average value of P is 20. The Average
value of Q = 400. Delta Q/Delta P is
unchanged. Thus the arc price
elasticity is
h
= (P/Q)(Delta Q/Delta P ) =
(20/400)(-20) = -1
2. The demand per household for a product is given by q = 12-3p.
· Compute consumer surplus assuming that the product is given away freely.
· Compute consumer surplus assuming that the product is sold at a price of $1 per unit.
· Now suppose the government imposes a tax of $1 on each unit of the product that is consumed. The proceeds of the tax are distributed to individuals in the community, independent of how much of the product they consume. What is the deadweight loss?
The
triangle has a base of 12 and a height of 4.
Thus the consumer surplus is (1/2)(12)(4) = 24. If the product is sold at $1 each, demand is
9, and the consumer surplus is (1/2)(9)(3) = $13.50. When the government imposes the tax, the demand drops to 6. The deadweight loss is (1/2)(1)(3) = $1.50. Remember that the deadweight loss applies only
to the products no longer consumed.
3.
Use the data in the following table to answer the question.
K = 10 |
K=20 |
K=30 |
|||
Q |
TC($) |
Q |
TC($) |
Q |
TC($) |
0 |
50 |
0 |
100 |
0 |
150 |
2 |
80 |
2 |
120 |
2 |
160 |
4 |
120 |
4 |
150 |
4 |
180 |
6 |
180 |
6 |
190 |
6 |
210 |
8 |
320 |
8 |
240 |
8 |
250 |
10 |
500 |
10 |
340 |
10 |
320 |
12 |
750 |
12 |
550 |
12 |
400 |
The firm also
knows that it is a price-taker at $35 per unit. (Obviously K – unites of capital, Q is quantity produced and TC
is total cost).
1.
What
constitutes this firm’s long run profit maximizing level of output?
2.
If the
firm is operating at its long run profit maximizing level of output, what
action would it undertake in the short run if the price rose to $45 a unit?
3.
What
action would the firm undertake in the long run if the price rose to $50 a
unit.
4.
Explain
why your answers to 2 and 3 are the same, if they are, or why they are
different, if they are.
Let
me answer the questions in order. The
long run cost function is given by the points in the following table. I have added a fourth column giving the long
run marginal cost of going from 0 to 2 to 4 units, etc. Each two units sells for $70, and it is
clear that marginal cost is still below price at Q = 8. Going from 8 to 10 units of output would
cost the firm money.
Q |
TC |
K |
MC |
0 |
$50 |
10 |
NA |
2 |
$80 |
10 |
$30 |
4 |
$120 |
10 |
$40 |
6 |
$180 |
10 |
$60 |
8 |
$240 |
20 |
$60 |
10 |
$320 |
30 |
$80 |
12 |
$400 |
40 |
$80 |
In
the short run where it was stuck with a value of K = 20, it would increase
output to 10 units. In the long run, it
would change K to 30 and increase output further to 12 units. The difference between the answers to 3 and
4 comes about because of the inability to change K in the short run