10283 HONR 30197-600 Junior Colloquium: "Ways of Knowing"
12:30 – 1:45 TR Fall 1999
Main Hall Rm 303
Dr. Leslie Heaphy Dr. Thomas M. Norton-Smith
Assistant Professor of History Associate Professor of Philosophy
310 F Main Hall, ext. 306 310 B Main Hall, ext. 302
Office Hours: 9-10 TR Office Hours: 8 - 8:45 MTWR
4-5 MW 11 – 12:15 TR
11-12 noon S
Or by appointment
e-mail: lheaphy@stark.kent.edu e-mail: tnorton-smith@stark.kent.edu
1. Rene Descartes, Discourse on Method, trans. Donald Cress, (Hackett, 1998).
II. OTHER REQUIRED READINGS (Library Reserve):
III. COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This Honors Colloquium will explore the sources, methodologies, subjects, objects, and purposes of various purported "ways of knowing," including Cartesian rationalism, feminist epistemology, cognitive psychology, Native-American visionism, and Confucianism. Given the different specialties of your professors, the exploration itself will employ historical and philosophical methodologies, and so will demonstrate ways of knowing in two different disciplines—history and philosophy.
IV. COURSE OBJECTIVES:
"Ways of Knowing" has several objectives:
Importantly, you are required to wonder, be puzzled, and learn a bunch. Otherwise, you must complete the daily reading assignments in a timely fashion, giving each careful consideration. This will enable you to satisfy the requirement of coming to class prepared to contribute to class discussions. As a rule, there are no extra credit assignments permitted, and you are responsible for all material missed due to absence.
1. There will be a midterm examination and a final, each worth 20% of the final grade. You are required to take these examinations on the scheduled dates, and you are required to complete both examinations to pass the class. If you miss an examination because of a documented excused absence, then you must take a make-up examination within one week following the original examination.
4. In summary, our semester of coursework will be weighted as follows (percentages are rounded):
Midterm examination 80 points (20%)
Final examination 80 points (20%)
Research paper 120 points (30%)
Thought experiment 60 points (15%)
Participation
Attendance and involvement 30 points (7.5%)
Opening presentation 30 points (7.5%)
Total 400 points (100%)
VI. EVALUATION OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE
In conformity with University policy regarding the evaluation of undergraduate performance, we use the following grading scale:
A (Excellent Scholarship) 400 – 368 points (100% - 92%)
B (Good Scholarship) 367 – 336 points (<92% - 84%)
C (Average Scholarship) 335 – 288 points (<84% -72%)
D (Poor Scholarship) 287 – 256 points (<72% - 64%)
F (Failure) Fewer than 256 points (<64%)
Cheating and plagiarism are wrong. For most people, no more needs to be said. However, there are people who believe that they have a right to steal the intellectual property produced by other people, probably because this kind of property is accessible, easy to take without the owner's permission. But the same is true of your vacationing neighbor's lawn mower in her unlocked garage, and not many people believe that that they have a right to steal the lawn mower without asking permission.
Anyway, we will treat everyone with a respect that extends to the products of their intellectual labors. Any person who chooses instead to "intentionally . . . misrepresent the source, nature, or other conditions of academic work so as to accrue undeserved credit" will be subject to the sanctions outlined in the section "Cheating and Plagiarism" in Kent State University's Digest of Rules and Regulations.
The Stark Campus’ procedure for handling student grievances conforms to the "Student Academic Complaint Policy & Procedures" set down as University Policy 3342-4-16 in the University Policy Register.
In accordance with University policy, if you have a documented disability and require accommodations to obtain equal access in this course, please contact me at the beginning of the semester or when given an assignment for which an accommodation is required. Students with disabilities must verify their eligibility through the office of Student Disability Services (SDS) on the first floor of Main Hall. You can contact Kelly Oster at ext. 287.
Clearly, our very ambitious semester schedule is tentative and subject to amendment. Should circumstances warrant, changes in the schedule will be announced and are a part of this syllabus.
X. SEMESTER READING AND EXAMINATION SCHEDULE:
Week I: August 30 - September 3
Aug. 31: Introductory material
Sept. 2: Descartes (Historical background)
Week II: September 7 - 10
Sept. 7: Read Descartes, Discourse on Method, Parts I and II
Sept. 9: Read Descartes, Parts III and IV
Week III: September 13 - 17
Sept. 14: Read Descartes, Parts V and VI.
Sept. 16: Read Norton-Smith, "An Arithmetic of Action Kinds," Philosophical Studies.
Week IV: September 20 - 24
Sept. 21: Read Karen Wynn, "Children’s Acquisition of the Number Words and the Counting System," Cognitive Psychology; "Infant’s Individuation and Enumeration of Actions," Psychological Science; "Addition and subtraction by human infants," Nature 358 (August 1992): 749-750.
Sept. 23: Read Robert Schwartz, "Is Mathematical Competence Innate?" Philosophy of Science. Guest lecture: Linda Norton-Smith
Week V: September 27 - October 1
Sept. 28: Open
Sept. 30: Read Genevieve Lloyd, "The Man of Reason," Women, Knowledge and Reality, pp. 149-165.
Read Marilyn Frye, "The Possibility of Feminist Theory," WK&R, pp. 34-47.
Topic chosen and approved for research paper by September 30th
Week VI: October 4 - 8
Oct. 5: Read Naomi Scheman, "The Unavoidability of Gender," WK&R, pp. 26-33.
Read Lorraine Code, "Taking Subjectivity into Account," WK&R, pp. 191-221.
Oct. 7: Read Janice Moulton, "A Paradigm of Philosophy," WK&R, pp. 11-25.
Alessandra Tanesini, "Whose Language?" WK&R, pp. 26-353-366.
PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEM DUE
Week VII: October 11 - 15
Oct. 12: Read Helen Longino, "Can There Be a Feminist Science?" WK&R, pp. 251-263.
Read Lynn Nelson, " Who Knows? What Can They Know? And When?" WK&R, pp. 286-297.
Oct. 14: Lourdes Torres, "The Construction of Self in U.S. Latina Autobiographies," WK&R, pp. 127-144.
Sally Haslanger, "Objective Reality, Male Reality, and Social Construction," WK&R, pp. 84-107.
Week VIII: October 18 – 22
Oct. 19: Judith Butler, "Imitation and Gender Insubordination," WK&R, pp. 371-387.
Hilde Hein, "Liberating Philosophy," WK&R, pp. 437-453.
Oct 21: MIDTERM EXAMINATION
Week IX: October 25 - 29
Oct. 26: Black Elk (Historical background)
Oct 28: Black Elk (Philosophical introduction)
Outline and Bibliography due for Research Paper on Oct. 28th
Week X: November 1 - 5
Nov. 2: Read Black Elk, chps. 1-9
Nov 4: Read Black Elk, chps. 10-18; class exercise
Week XI: November 8 - 12
Nov. 9: Finish Black Elk.
Nov. 11: VETERANS DAY
Week XII: November 15 - 19
Nov. 16: Confucius--historical background; Read Foreword and Introduction of The Analects
Nov. 18: Read Chapters 1-4 and the corresponding notes (p. 4-18 and 105-136) in The Analects
Week XIII: November 22 - 26
Nov. 23: Read Chapters 5-8 and the corresponding notes (p. 19-38 and 137-157) in The Analects
THANKSGIVING BREAK: Thursday, November 25
Week XIV: November 29 - December 1
Nov. 30: Read Chapters 9-12 and the corresponding notes (p. 39-59 and 158-180) in The Analects
Research paper Due Nov. 30th
Dec. 2: Read Chapters 13-16 and the corresponding notes (p. 60-84 and 181-199) in The Analects
Week XV: December 6 - 10
Dec. 7: Read Chapters 17-20 and the corresponding notes (p. 85-101 and 200-212) in The Analects
Dec. 9: Summary and Review
Final Examination: Tuesday, December 14, 12:00 – 1:45 p.m.
Fall 1999