10283 HONR 30197-600 Junior Colloquium: "Ways of Knowing"

12:30 – 1:45 TR Fall 1999

Main Hall Rm 303

Dr. Leslie Heaphy Dr. Thomas M. Norton-Smith

Assistant Professor of History Associate Professor of Philosophy

310 F Main Hall, ext. 306 310 B Main Hall, ext. 302

Office Hours: 9-10 TR Office Hours: 8 - 8:45 MTWR

4-5 MW 11 – 12:15 TR

11-12 noon S

Or by appointment

e-mail: lheaphy@stark.kent.edu e-mail: tnorton-smith@stark.kent.edu

 

  1. REQUIRED TEXTS (Bookstore):

1. Rene Descartes, Discourse on Method, trans. Donald Cress, (Hackett, 1998).

  1. Women, Knowledge and Reality, eds. Ann Garry and Marilyn Pearsall, (Routledge 1996).
  2. John Neihardt, Black Elk Speaks, (University of Nebraska Press, 1988).
  3. The Analects of Confucius, trans. Simon Leys, (W.W. Norton & Co., 1997).

II. OTHER REQUIRED READINGS (Library Reserve):

  1. Thomas Norton-Smith, "An Arithmetic of Action Kinds," Philosophical Studies 63 (1991): 217-230.
  2. Karen Wynn, "Children’s Acquisition of the Number Words and the Counting System," Cognitive Psychology 24 (1992): 220-251.
  3. Karen Wynn, "Infant’s Individuation and Enumeration of Actions," Psychological Science 7 (May 1996): 164-169.
  4. Karen Wynn, "Addition and subtraction by human infants," Nature 358 (August 1992): 749-750.
  5. Robert Schwartz, "Is Mathematical Competence Innate?" Philosophy of Science 62 (1995): 227-240.

III. COURSE DESCRIPTION:

This Honors Colloquium will explore the sources, methodologies, subjects, objects, and purposes of various purported "ways of knowing," including Cartesian rationalism, feminist epistemology, cognitive psychology, Native-American visionism, and Confucianism. Given the different specialties of your professors, the exploration itself will employ historical and philosophical methodologies, and so will demonstrate ways of knowing in two different disciplines—history and philosophy.

 

 

 

 

 

IV. COURSE OBJECTIVES:

"Ways of Knowing" has several objectives:

  1. To improve your reading and critical thinking skills through a careful consideration of the reading assignments;
  2. To exercise and improve your writing skills with many writing opportunities;
  3. To enhance your ability to express yourself through classroom participation, and to foster your respect for and appreciation of beliefs with which you may not agree;
  4. To promote your understanding and appreciation of a variety of different ways of knowing, e.g., Cartesian rationalism and feminist epistemology;
  5. To demonstrate the similarities and differences between two approaches to the question of knowing, namely, the historical and the philosophical;
  6. To stress the importance of diversity in thought.

 

  1. COURSE REQUIREMENTS:

Importantly, you are required to wonder, be puzzled, and learn a bunch. Otherwise, you must complete the daily reading assignments in a timely fashion, giving each careful consideration. This will enable you to satisfy the requirement of coming to class prepared to contribute to class discussions. As a rule, there are no extra credit assignments permitted, and you are responsible for all material missed due to absence.

1. There will be a midterm examination and a final, each worth 20% of the final grade. You are required to take these examinations on the scheduled dates, and you are required to complete both examinations to pass the class. If you miss an examination because of a documented excused absence, then you must take a make-up examination within one week following the original examination.

  1. There will be two writing assignments, a research paper worth 30% of the final grade, and a "thought experiment" worth 15% of the final grade. The research paper will give you the opportunity to put into practice the methods employed in the discipline of history, that is, you will have the opportunity to become historians yourselves. Philosophers are people who ask "fundamental" questions about the nature of reality, knowledge and value. Philosophy is thus a kind of activity, and like other activities, you can learn much about philosophy by doing it. The thought experiment gives you the opportunity to do some philosophizing.
  2. A class participation grade, heavily influenced by attendance and involvement (7.5%) and a brief presentation introducing one day’s reading (7.5%) counts the final 15% of your grade.

 

4. In summary, our semester of coursework will be weighted as follows (percentages are rounded):

Midterm examination 80 points (20%)

Final examination 80 points (20%)

Research paper 120 points (30%)

Thought experiment 60 points (15%)

Participation

Attendance and involvement 30 points (7.5%)

Opening presentation 30 points (7.5%)

Total 400 points (100%)

VI. EVALUATION OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE

In conformity with University policy regarding the evaluation of undergraduate performance, we use the following grading scale:

A (Excellent Scholarship) 400 – 368 points (100% - 92%)

B (Good Scholarship) 367 – 336 points (<92% - 84%)

C (Average Scholarship) 335 – 288 points (<84% -72%)

D (Poor Scholarship) 287 – 256 points (<72% - 64%)

F (Failure) Fewer than 256 points (<64%)

 

  1. CHEATING, PLAGIARISM AND OTHER DECEPTIONS:
  2. Cheating and plagiarism are wrong. For most people, no more needs to be said. However, there are people who believe that they have a right to steal the intellectual property produced by other people, probably because this kind of property is accessible, easy to take without the owner's permission. But the same is true of your vacationing neighbor's lawn mower in her unlocked garage, and not many people believe that that they have a right to steal the lawn mower without asking permission.

    Anyway, we will treat everyone with a respect that extends to the products of their intellectual labors. Any person who chooses instead to "intentionally . . . misrepresent the source, nature, or other conditions of academic work so as to accrue undeserved credit" will be subject to the sanctions outlined in the section "Cheating and Plagiarism" in Kent State University's Digest of Rules and Regulations.

  3. GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE:

The Stark Campus’ procedure for handling student grievances conforms to the "Student Academic Complaint Policy & Procedures" set down as University Policy 3342-4-16 in the University Policy Register.

 

 

  1. STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES:
  2. In accordance with University policy, if you have a documented disability and require accommodations to obtain equal access in this course, please contact me at the beginning of the semester or when given an assignment for which an accommodation is required. Students with disabilities must verify their eligibility through the office of Student Disability Services (SDS) on the first floor of Main Hall. You can contact Kelly Oster at ext. 287.

  3. AMENDMENTS:

Clearly, our very ambitious semester schedule is tentative and subject to amendment. Should circumstances warrant, changes in the schedule will be announced and are a part of this syllabus.

X. SEMESTER READING AND EXAMINATION SCHEDULE:

Week I: August 30 - September 3

Aug. 31: Introductory material

Sept. 2: Descartes (Historical background)

Week II: September 7 - 10

Sept. 7: Read Descartes, Discourse on Method, Parts I and II

Sept. 9: Read Descartes, Parts III and IV

Week III: September 13 - 17

Sept. 14: Read Descartes, Parts V and VI.

Sept. 16: Read Norton-Smith, "An Arithmetic of Action Kinds," Philosophical Studies.

Week IV: September 20 - 24

Sept. 21: Read Karen Wynn, "Children’s Acquisition of the Number Words and the Counting System," Cognitive Psychology; "Infant’s Individuation and Enumeration of Actions," Psychological Science; "Addition and subtraction by human infants," Nature 358 (August 1992): 749-750.

Sept. 23: Read Robert Schwartz, "Is Mathematical Competence Innate?" Philosophy of Science. Guest lecture: Linda Norton-Smith

Week V: September 27 - October 1

Sept. 28: Open

Sept. 30: Read Genevieve Lloyd, "The Man of Reason," Women, Knowledge and Reality, pp. 149-165.

Read Marilyn Frye, "The Possibility of Feminist Theory," WK&R, pp. 34-47.

Topic chosen and approved for research paper by September 30th

Week VI: October 4 - 8

Oct. 5: Read Naomi Scheman, "The Unavoidability of Gender," WK&R, pp. 26-33.

Read Lorraine Code, "Taking Subjectivity into Account," WK&R, pp. 191-221.

Oct. 7: Read Janice Moulton, "A Paradigm of Philosophy," WK&R, pp. 11-25.

Alessandra Tanesini, "Whose Language?" WK&R, pp. 26-353-366.

PHILOSOPHICAL PROBLEM DUE

Week VII: October 11 - 15

Oct. 12: Read Helen Longino, "Can There Be a Feminist Science?" WK&R, pp. 251-263.

Read Lynn Nelson, " Who Knows? What Can They Know? And When?" WK&R, pp. 286-297.

Oct. 14: Lourdes Torres, "The Construction of Self in U.S. Latina Autobiographies," WK&R, pp. 127-144.

Sally Haslanger, "Objective Reality, Male Reality, and Social Construction," WK&R, pp. 84-107.

Week VIII: October 18 – 22

Oct. 19: Judith Butler, "Imitation and Gender Insubordination," WK&R, pp. 371-387.

Hilde Hein, "Liberating Philosophy," WK&R, pp. 437-453.

Oct 21: MIDTERM EXAMINATION

Week IX: October 25 - 29

Oct. 26: Black Elk (Historical background)

Oct 28: Black Elk (Philosophical introduction)

Outline and Bibliography due for Research Paper on Oct. 28th

Week X: November 1 - 5

Nov. 2: Read Black Elk, chps. 1-9

Nov 4: Read Black Elk, chps. 10-18; class exercise

Week XI: November 8 - 12

Nov. 9: Finish Black Elk.

Nov. 11: VETERANS DAY

Week XII: November 15 - 19

Nov. 16: Confucius--historical background; Read Foreword and Introduction of The Analects

Nov. 18: Read Chapters 1-4 and the corresponding notes (p. 4-18 and 105-136) in The Analects

Week XIII: November 22 - 26

Nov. 23: Read Chapters 5-8 and the corresponding notes (p. 19-38 and 137-157) in The Analects

THANKSGIVING BREAK: Thursday, November 25

Week XIV: November 29 - December 1

Nov. 30: Read Chapters 9-12 and the corresponding notes (p. 39-59 and 158-180) in The Analects

Research paper Due Nov. 30th

Dec. 2: Read Chapters 13-16 and the corresponding notes (p. 60-84 and 181-199) in The Analects

Week XV: December 6 - 10

Dec. 7: Read Chapters 17-20 and the corresponding notes (p. 85-101 and 200-212) in The Analects

Dec. 9: Summary and Review

 

Final Examination: Tuesday, December 14, 12:00 – 1:45 p.m.

Fall 1999