In order to supplement the instructional designer’s
personal knowledge, experience, and observations derived from teaching Inquiry
into Teaching and Learning (Inquiry II) for seven semesters and from employment
with the public schools, two brief surveys were developed. One was sent to five
other Inquiry II instructors, with three (i.e., 60%) responding; the other was
distributed in the two Inquiry classes I teach. Twenty-five (25) out of the 32
students (i.e., 78.13%) completed and returned their surveys. In conducting the
Learner and Context Analysis, student surveys were given greater consideration
than those completed by the instructors, since the former directly reflect the
perceptions and attitudes of the immediate target learning population.
Learner and Context Analysis
Category |
Data Source |
Characteristic |
Implication(s) |
Learners |
|
|
|
Entry Behaviors |
Observation |
Learners have mastered entry behaviors
(e.g., reading, writing, college-level vocabulary, recognizing parts of a
lesson plan.) |
No remedial component is required in the
design of the instruction on objective-writing. |
Prior Knowledge |
Student & instructor
surveys; interaction with students; observation |
Prior knowledge re writing good
instructional objectives ranges from none to a lot, with
most learners in the a little and some categories. |
Instruction needs to start with the
fundamentals, to prevent gaps in skill development, while also maintaining
interest of more knowledgeable students. These learners may be able to
assist their “novice” peers. |
Attitudes |
Student & instructor
surveys |
Most students recognize the importance of
lesson plans. Feelings range from inadequacy and nervousness to feeling
comfortable and enthusiastic about writing them. Perception of tedium and
curtailment of creativity are potential hindrances. |
Instruction should be clear,
straightforward, supportive, and interesting to alleviate learner concerns
and reinforce positive attitudes. Build in “scaffolding” in the sequencing
of instruction to assist less knowledgeable students. Group work may be
helpful. |
Motivation |
Student & instructor
surveys; observation |
Most are motivated to learn skill of
writing good objectives |
Instruction should be designed to
capitalize on student motivation and keep interest high (e.g., tying
examples to real-life scenarios, and keeping the pace fairly lively). |
Education
and Ability |
Observation of
performance; student & instructor surveys |
Learners have been exposed to
a variety of approaches and are functioning at an early college level. A
few students need help expressing themselves clearly (e.g., word choice,
sentence structure) |
Any number of techniques and
strategies could be used to present the instruction, which needs to be
clear and explicit. Group work may be helpful so that students can share
skills and experience. |
Learning Preferences
|
Student & instructor
surveys; interaction with students; observation |
Active learning preferred, particularly
hands-on experiences and discussion. Also, games, small-group projects,
and case studies. |
Design instruction to keep learners
actively engaged. Possibly incorporate group work and a game or hands-on
experience. |
Attitudes toward organization |
Student & instructor
surveys; interaction with students |
Attitudes toward KSU College of Education
range from very positive to somewhat negative. Some learners have mixed
feelings. |
Be sure instruction is well-organized,
supportive, positive, logical, and clear; objectives should be stated at
the outset and activities should be consistent with objectives. Be sure
students understand what they are doing and why. |
Group characteristics |
Instructor surveys;
observation; discussions with instructors |
Most are: between 19 & about 23 years of
age; of European descent; sophomore level or above; middle-class; fairly
naïve/sheltered/inexperienced. Variety of education fields within the
target population. |
Use language and examples learners can
relate to while introducing them to less familiar ideas. Refer to a
variety of subjects and age groups in developing sample instructional
objectives. |
Context:
Performance |
|
|
|
Support |
Personal experience in
public schools; interactions with instructors in College of
Education, KSU; course requirements |
It
is understood that learners will be expected to write objectives & will be
supported in that effort by college instructors & school administrators. |
This module will carefully lay the foundation needed to develop good
objective-writing skills that can be used in a variety of situations.
|
Physical Aspects |
Personal experience |
Only
pen/pencil, paper, writing surface needed; word processor optional |
Instruction could be carried out in a variety of settings (e.g., in the
classroom, library, outdoors, at home). |
Social Aspects |
Observation, personal
experience |
Learners will likely write instructional objectives independently more
often than not; however, these objectives will be shared with others &
will guide activities and assessment in the learners’ classrooms. Also,
learners may be engaged in collaborative objective-writing in courses and
as teachers. |
The
instructional module should be designed in such a way that the learners
can apply their objective-writing skills independently or in a group
setting. |
Relevance |
Personal experience;
Praxis III guidelines |
Highly relevant to education courses &
workplace; time a possible constraint |
Instruction should use real-life material &
help learners to be efficient objective-writers. |
Context:
Learning |
|
|
|
Compatibility with
workplace |
Observation |
Five
computers are available in the room for word processing, if
desired. (ratio of about 3-4 students per computer). |
Instruction could be designed for group work using computers instead of
pen and paper. |
Ability to simulate
workplace |
Observation |
Since the learners are
future teachers, instruction done either in the classroom or off-site will
be in an environment almost identical to the work environment.
|
No special design
accommodations are required to simulate the workplace. Easy transfer of
learning is expected from performance in learning setting to other
classroom environments. |
Adapt to Delivery
Approaches? |
Instructional Design course assignment guidelines. |
No
“live” instructor required. |
Instruction must be designed to be self-explanatory. |
Design and Delivery
Constraints |
Observation; personal experience |
No real constraints except limits on size
of target audience: learning environment is large enough to accommodate
about 20 students comfortably; trapezoidal tables can be arranged easily
in various configurations; computers, overhead projector, and white board
are available in the room. |
A number of options are available in
designing the instruction. Students could work individually or
collectively and use technological tools or just paper and a pen/pencil. |
|