MIS 44150 Spring 2012 Weinroth
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY
KENT CAMPUS
COURSE SYLLABUS
MIS 44150 Total Quality Management
Spring 2012
JAY WEINROTH OFFICE HOURS: Before class time
Associate Professor
Management and Information Systems
PHONE MESSAGES: Senior Secretary Ms.Pam Silliman 330 672-1140
EMAIL: gweinroth@gmail.com
M & IS 44150
3 Credit Hours
4:25 PM to 7:05 PM
This syllabus is available on-line at http://#
Click on “resources” then “syllabi archives” choose Spring 2012 then this course title
Textbook/Instructional Materials:
- Quality & Performance Excellence, James Evans, 6th edition.
- Handout materials provided by instructor.
Course Description:
Considers the application of sound management principles and theories needed for quality processes and systems. The course is focused on the stages of analysis leading to implementation of a total quality environment in an organization, and relies heavily on work completed by student teams. Prerequisite: see catalog.
This course may be used to satisfy the writing intensive course graduation requirement with the approval of the major department.
Course Objectives:
· To provide the student with a historical background on the quality movement within the context of the principles of management.
· Provide the student with a comprehensive view of quality in production and service environments.
· Develop an appreciation for personal adoption of quality principles.
· Provide the student with background to comprehend the challenges presented as an organization moves to a TQM environment.
· Insure students have an understanding of the basics of implementation of TQM, and the opportunities for and threats to successful change from current status to a TQM environment.
Method of Instruction:
We will pursue an in-depth study of a local business or not-for-profit organization, beginning with an examination of their strategic situation and competitive profile, discovering the concerns of customers and objectives of management, studying the flow of the work process, determining what constitute important defects in the product, where these occur in the work process, tracing defects to their sources and identifying best choices for remedies. The entire class will be involved in each stage of the process of analysis.
Your performance will be evaluated as follows:
Team assignments – 4 @ 150 points 600 points
Individual performance on quizzes –
10 @ 40 points 400 points
------------
Total 1000 points
Grading scale: A 890 – 1000
B 790 – 889
C 670 – 789
D 600 – 669
F below 600
Major consideration concerning your work within your team –
The key to successful work in this class is active participation by every member of each student team. If you have worked in a team in previous classes, you already know what I am getting at here. So here is how the team grades will work. For each team assignment, I as the instructor will give your team a grade on the quality of the work. Then, for each successive pair of team assignments, for example, assignment 1 and assignment 2, you will turn in a notebook detailing the work you have done as an individual team member. These notes need to be specific – what part of the team assignment you performed. For example, if you are part of the process of interviewing employees at the business we are studying, you need to make notes on what questions you asked and what answers you got. We will use a review process within each team so that your team mates fact-check your notes on accuracy. This brings us to the point that each of your team assignments worth 150 points consists of two parts, each of which is worth 75 points. The first part is the grade I give to the team for the quality of its work. The second part is the grade I give to you as an individual, for the amount of effort and personal contributions to the team’s work, based on the content of your notebook. Please note – do not wait until these notebooks are due and then try to complete your report on your work. Keep notes every time you do some work for your team’s assignment. I will read your notebooks twice during the semester, as shown in the class schedule.
Class Participation/Attendance:
In order to gain the maximum from this course you must be an active participant. We learn from each other with everyone having equal input that is worthy and valuable. Real world examples are welcome as long as they are relevant. Be courteous and tolerant of other view points. Be aware that 40% of your grade in the course comes from essay quizzes you will complete at some time during ten of our class meetings.
Students with Disabilities:
In accordance with University policy, if you have a documented disability and require accommodations to obtain equal access in this course, please contact the instructor at the beginning of the semester or when given an assignment for which an accommodation is required.
Prerequisites: Students attending the course who do not have the proper prerequisite risk being deregistered from the class.
Proper Registration:
Students have responsibility to ensure they are properly enrolled in classes. You are advised to review your official class schedule during the first two weeks of the semester to ensure you are properly enrolled in this class and section. Should you find an error in your class schedule, please correct it at the Student Services office. If registration errors are not corrected and you continue to attend and participate in classes for which you are not officially enrolled, you are advised now that you will not receive a grade at the conclusion of the semester for any class in which you are not properly registered.
Course Withdrawal:
Check with the registrar or the business school undergraduate office for the deadline for withdrawal from an individual course. Withdrawal before the deadline results in a “No Grade” on the official transcript; after the deadline, a “W” must be reported for the grade.
Academic Honesty:
Cheating means to misrepresent the source, nature, or other conditions of your academic work (e.g., tests, papers, projects, assignments) so as to get undeserved credit. The use of the intellectual property of others without giving them appropriate credit is a serious academic offense. It is the University’s policy that cheating or plagiarism result in receiving a failing grade for the work or course. Repeat offenses result in dismissal from the University.
Children In Class:
Due to the nature and pace of this course, children are not to be brought to class. Children are not permitted in Computer Labs.
Electronic Devices:
No tape recorders, video tape equipment, cameras, or other communication equipment and/or devices are to be used in class without the express permission of the instructor.
COURSE PLAN BY DATE
Dates when teams are responsible for presenting work on the improvement project --
Week Tuesday date Teams
1 |
1/10/2012 |
|
|
2 |
1/17/2012 |
|
|
3 |
1/24/2012 |
|
|
4 |
1/31/2012 |
|
1 2 3 |
5 |
2/7/2012 |
|
4 5 6 |
6 |
2/14/2012 |
|
|
7 |
2/21/2012 |
|
1 2 3 |
8 |
2/28/2012 |
|
4 5 6 |
9 |
3/6/2012 |
|
1 2 3 |
10 |
3/13/2012 |
|
4 5 6 |
11 |
3/20/2012 |
spring break |
|
12 |
3/27/2012 |
|
|
13 |
4/3/2012 |
|
1 2 3 |
14 |
4/10/2012 |
|
|
15 |
4/17/2012 |
|
4 5 6 |
16 |
4/24/2012 |
|
|
See details in the following weekly schedule
General information concerning the work we will be doing –
During the weeks of the semester, as we study concepts and procedures of total quality management, we will tie everything together through students in the class carrying out observations, gathering data, completing frameworks of analysis, and related tasks in order to MODEL the process in which an organization carries out a total quality improvement project with a lean management approach. Here is the sequence we will follow –
- Basic information on the company or organization -- history, firm size, products or services, weekly sales volume or equivalent, number of employees, revenue, profit or budget, market share, competition
- Concerns of customers and other stakeholders, aspirations of management for improvement
- Project selection matrix – identify priority improvement project – all further work focused on this project
- Identification of defect in the process
- Flow chart of process with identification of problem area, process times, defects
- Causal map of possible causes of identified problem
- Calculate process sigma level (as in six sigma) and Tagucci loss function for the process
- Construct and administer customer survey to match critical issues with details of causal map
- Input range of stakeholder concerns to construct Quality Function Deployment grid and identify one or more best solutions to the problem.
Week 1
Meeting missed due to instructor error
January 17
Week 2
Distribute Syllabus/Method of Instruction
Student and Instructor Biographical Summaries
Discuss finding local firm to study
Form teams – we need to form teams on basis of convenience of
team member class/work schedules and neighborhoods.
We also need to decide on responsibilities for teams to visit
the site of a local firm we will be studying – possibility of
rotating team responsibilities for this. Could send one member
of each team.
Chapter 1, Introduction to Quality, pages 3-13, 22- 35, table 1.1
January 24 Week 3
Select local firm – management must be comfortable with your observing the
process and talking with customers and workers .
Team assignments for reports on January 31 -- team 1 = strategic profile of the
Firm; team 2 = customer concerns; team 3 = management wish-list.
Video – the Red Bead experiment – conclusions about dealing with
defects and nature of control limits
Constructing a project selection matrix – what to focus on in our study –see
Handouts
Chapter 4 , Tools & Techniques, pages 140-149
January 31
Week 4
Teams present 1 for the Project Selection Matrix -- Team focus– (1) strategic
profile– (2) customer concerns (informal survey) - (3) management wish-list.
Pick 6 best vertical and horizontal, construct matrix – Final agreement on our
focus in this firm.
Chapter 2, Frameworks of Quality – pages 46 – 60, – Crosby, quality is free –
deming’s 14 points
Deming on five deadly diseases
Discuss concept of Defect for next week assignment.
February 7
Week 5
Teams present 2– what is a defect for the process we are studying? (teams 4,5,6)
Concept of Process mapping (flow charts)– examples – discuss format for presentation – excel? Transparencies?
Calculation and meaning of process sigma level and Tagucci loss function (see handouts)
In chapter 2, pages 83 -89 on 6 Sigma
Chapter 3, 104 -126
Chapter 4, pages 148-156
February 14
Week 6
TBA – finish previous topics
February 21
Week 7
Teams present 3 -- teams 1,2,3 -- process maps– class creates synthesis
Performance Measurement – Causal Mapping (fishbone
diagram) -- See Case Study – auto parts distributor
Chapter 4, pages 150-156
Identify candidate defect areas – use to construct causal maps
Identify what we will measure in terms of process sigma level
February 28
Week 8
teams present 4 causal maps -- teams 4,5,6
Class brainstorms final map – use for constructing survey
Chapter 8, Quality in Customer-Supplier Relationships, pages 240-262
Survey – find significant problems – focus on dissatisfaction
Survey needs specific items related to causal map and questions on overall satisfaction
NOTE BOOKS DUE
March 6
Week 9
Teams present 5 data on process sigma level and loss
function – teams 1,2,3 -- details TBA
Chapter 4, Tools & Techniques, pages 140-149
March 13
Week 10
teams present 6 -- candidate survey items – teams 4,5,6
Class critiques – selects final items for ONE overall survey –
Causal map and process sigma level indicates survey content
Discuss strategy for administering – see note for April 3 class
meeting
Chapter 9, Engagement, Empowerment, and Motivation, pages 345-359
Chapter 8, Quality Teamwork, Pages 323-333
Job Characteristics Model (continued on march 27)
March 20
Week 11 – spring break
March 27
Week 12
Continue previous topics
QFD analysis – see handout
Cost of Quality
Pages 58-60, 109-110
April 3
Week 13
Teams present 7 -- survey results– team 1 = administer – team 2 = data analysis – team 3 = interpret results
April 10
Week 14
Lean enterprise – see handouts for remainder of topics
chapter 4, pages 154-164
April 17
Week 15
Lean enterprise – Kanban – Kaizen – lean strategy
Teams present 8 -- QFD tables – teams 4,5,6 – as assigned, teams will
represent concerns of employees, managers, and customers
April 24
Week 16
Celebration
NOTE BOOKS DUE
As a standardized tool for returning grade scores to you, I will use the following page, complete with comments.
EVALUATION FORMAT FOR TEAM AND INDIVIDUAL WORK
TEAM:
ASSIGNMENT:
|
FAIL |
POOR |
FAIR |
GOOD |
EXCELLENT |
SCORE |
Organization $ 10 points |
0-6 |
6.1-7 |
7.1-8 |
8.1-9 |
9.1-10 |
|
Exposition $$ 10 points |
0-6 |
6.1-7 |
7.1-8 |
8.1-9 |
9.1-10 |
|
Factual Integrity $$ 30 points |
0-17 |
18-20 |
21-23 |
24-26 |
27-30 |
|
Thematic Focus $$$ 50 points |
0-29 |
30-34 |
35-39 |
40-44 |
45-50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL |
|
$ |
Logical, readable paragraphs with clear purpose and focused intent |
$$ |
Grammar, spelling, punctuation and proper citations |
$$$ |
The use of accurate claims in an appropriate fashion |
$$$$ |
Meaningful generalizations and insights focused well upon a stated thesis conveying a cohesive point of view and thoughtful grasp of the issue. |