Personal tools
You are here: Home Academics Syllabi Spring 2013 MIS 64271-Stark-Spring 2013 Hogue

MIS 64271-Stark-Spring 2013 Hogue

Human Resource Management

Spring 2013

 

Instructor:                   Mary Hogue, Ph.D.

Office:                         College of Business A423

Phone:                         (330) 672-1148

Office Hours:              Thursday 3:00-6:00 at my office in Kent

Also, I’ll arrive at the Stark campus about an hour before class starts. I can stay after as well, and I can meet at a mutually convenient time.

E-Mail:                        mhogue@kent.edu

Required Text:            Noe, R. A., Hollenbeck, J. R., Gerhart, B., Wright, P. M. (2011)

                                    Fundamentals of Human Resource Management. New York:

                                    McGraw-Hill.

 

Course Objectives:

  1. Acquire knowledge of basic human resource management (HRM) concepts/processes.
  2. Develop an awareness of the applications of HRM concepts/processes in your own organization, the organizations with which you come into contact, the news.
  3. Critical analysis of applications of HRM concepts/practices.

 

Class Procedures: Your book is essential reading for class. You must read it and be familiar with the concepts therein before arriving in class because our time together will be spent expanding on the material in the book. The book provides your foundational knowledge. Our class discussions will build on that to create a more integrative, deeper understanding of the material.

 

Each class (except for test days) will follow the same format.

  • We will begin with questions about the assigned chapters.
    • You will ask me about things you don’t understand.
    • I will pose questions to you to ensure that you do understand.
  • I may present additional material related to the assigned topics and designed to expand your understanding.
    • Your book is a “fundamentals” book, which means it offers you information on all of the basics. However, basic information is in no way sufficient for a master’s level class. Once you understand basic terms and concepts from the text, we will go deeper into the material to explore how concepts and techniques work in the real world.
  • We will listen to a debate presentation.
    • As you will learn, there is much controversy involved in the management of people. There will be one area of controversy related to the assigned reading material that will be scheduled for deeper examination each night. Students will work in pairs or groups (depending on class size) to research and present both sides of the debate topic. Both/all members of the pair/group must be familiar with both sides of the issue, and both/all members of the pair/group must be involved in the preparation and presentation of each side.
  • Audience members will present debaters with additional questions and examples.
    • These questions might be simple questions of clarification, or they may be deeper questions that ask the panel for more comprehensive coverage of the topic.
    • Additionally, students in the audience will come to the debate with a news story related to the application of the debate topic within a real organization. These news stories may pose an opportunity for the debate team to expand on their previous presentation, or they may pose an opportunity for the audience member to challenge the debate team’s presentation. Therefore, debate teams must be thorough in their research and preparation.
  • We will wrap up the class with specific thoughts and take-away points.

 

Determinations of Course Success:

 

Application papers

Application papers are those real-word examples that are brought by audience members to add to discussion about a debate topic. There are 11 opportunities for you to hand in application papers. You must hand in 7. Each is worth 5 points for a total of 35 points. To earn points, it is not sufficient to simply hand in a paper. You also must discuss your example during class.

 

Debates. Students will work in appropriately sized groups so that each student works on 2 debates. Each student can earn up to 50 points for each debate. Forty will be determined by me and assigned according to the clarity and comprehensiveness of the presentation; ten will be assigned by your group members for your participation.

 

Exams

There are 3 exams. Each contains multiple choice and short answer questions. Multiple-choice questions will be drawn from your textbook. Short answer questions will be drawn from our class discussions – the material I bring to class as well as the material that is debated.

 

Tests will begin as soon as class begins. You will have 2 hours to complete the exam. No one can begin an exam after the first person has finished and left the room, so it is important that you arrive on time. Each exam is worth 55 points.

           

Missed work. No late application papers will be accepted, so schedule your time accordingly. No make-up tests will be allowed without a documented and approved excuse. Your employer, a doctor, or the university must provide acceptable documentation.

 

 

 

Grading:

 

Available Points

Grade Allocation

Application papers (7 x 5) 35 pts.

Debates (50 x 2)                  100 pts.

Exam 1                                    55 pts.

Exam 2                                    55 pts.

Final exam                              55 pts.

Total                                      300 pts.

 

A             93-100%               279-300

A-            90-92.99%            270-278.99          

B+           87-89.99%            261-269.99          

B             83-86.99%            249-260.99          

B-            80-82.99%            240-248.99          

C+           77-79.99%            231-239.99          

C             73-76.99%            219-230.99          

C-            70-72.99%            210-218.99          

D             60-69.99%            180-209.99          

F          below 59.

 

 

Grade dispute: If you are unhappy with the grade you receive on any assignment, I will happily revisit my decision. For this to occur, you must make your argument IN WRITING within 3 days of receiving your grade. Your explanation should include your rationale for deserving a different grade (“I worked really hard on this” is not rationale for receiving a different grade) along with any supporting material. Keep in mind, however, that upon revisiting my decision, any change can be made in your grade. It might be raised as you request, but you also run the risk of it being lowered.

 

Class attendance: All students are expected to attend class regularly and are responsible for all material covered even when they miss class.

 

The Following Policies Apply to All Students in this Course:

Students attending the course who do not have the proper prerequisite risk being deregistered from the class.

 

Students have responsibility to ensure they are properly enrolled in classes.  You are advised to review your official class schedule (using Student Tools on FlashLine) during the first two weeks of the semester to ensure you are properly enrolled in this class and section.  Should you find an error in your class schedule, you have until Sunday, Sunday, January 27, 2013 to correct the error.  If registration errors are not corrected by this date and you continue to attend and participate in classes for which you are not officially enrolled, you are advised now that you will not receive a grade at the conclusion of the semester for any class in which you are not properly registered.

 

Academic honesty: Academic honesty: Cheating means to misrepresent the source, nature, or other conditions of your academic work (e.g., tests, papers, projects, assignments) so as to get undeserved credit.   In addition, it is considered to cheating when one cooperates with someone else in any such misrepresentation.  The use of the intellectual property of others without giving them appropriate credit is a serious academic offense.  It is the University's policy that cheating or plagiarism result in receiving a failing grade for the work or course.  Repeat offenses result in dismissal from the University.

 

For Spring 2013, the course withdrawal deadline is Sunday, March 24, 2013.

 

Students needing accessability: University policy 3342-3-01.3 requires that students with disabilities be provided reasonable accommodations to ensure their equal access to course content. If you have a documented disability and require accommodations, please contact the instructor at the beginning of the semester to make arrangements for necessary classroom adjustments. Please note, you must first verify your eligibility for these through Student Accessibility Services (contact 330-672-3391 or visit http://www.registrars.kent.edu/disability/  for more information on registration procedures).

Course schedule: The following is a tentative schedule for this course. Chapter assignments are subject to change as the course progresses. Any changes will be announced in class.

 

 

Date

 

Assigned chapter

 

Debate Topic

1/16

Ch. 1: Managing human resources

  

Assignment of debate groups

 

1/23

Ch. 2: Trends in HRM

 

 

Offshoring

  1. Offshoring of jobs increases profits for US

      companies, thereby increasing profits for

      shareholders, ultimately helping the US and world

      economies.

   2. Offshoring eliminates jobs for US workers,

      thereby reducing or eliminating pay for US

      workers, ultimately hurting the US and world

      economies.

1/30

Ch. 3: Providing EEO and safe workplace

  

Affirmative Action (AA)

   1. AA remains a necessary employment policy.

   2. AA is no longer a viable or necessary emp’t

       policy.

 

2/6

Ch. 4: Analyzing work and designing jobs

 

Bias in Job analysis (JA)

   1. JA tools and techniques are designed to be

       free of bias, allowing a determination of the

       objective reality of the job and the requisite

       KSAOs to ultimately reduce discrimination.      

    2. JA is conducted by people who view all

        results through their own biases, disallowing

        a determination of objective reality, thereby

        creating an inability to avoid potential

        discrimination.

 

2/13

Test 1

 

 

2/20

Ch. 5: Planning for and recruiting HRs

 

Electronic recruiting resources

   1. Reliance on electronic recruiting resources

       results in workplace discrimination that

       disadvantages lower income workers.

   2. Reliance on electronic recruiting resources

       is an effective method of screening for

        employees ready to work in a 21st-

        century work environment.

 

2/27

Ch. 6: Selecting employees and placing them in jobs

 

Employee dishonesty in job seeking

   1. Resume embellishment, mild interview

       faking and slight dishonesty in job

       applications are no big deal because most

       everyone engages in them to some degree.

   2. Resume embellishment, mild interview

       faking and slight dishonesty in job applications

       present a large problem for organizations.

 

3/6

Ch. 7: Training employees

Ch. 9: Developing employees for future success

Computer-based learning

   1. Computer-based training enhances employee

       learning and is cost-effective for the

       organization.

    2. Computer-based training reduces employee

        learning and is cost-prohibitive for the

        organization.

3/13

Ch. 8: Managing employee performance

 

Performance appraisal

   1. A formal performance appraisal system

       increases overall employee and firm

       performance.

   2. The performance appraisal process is filled

       with politics and bias and ultimately creates

       problems that reduce employee and firm

       performance.

 

3/20

Test 2

 

3/27

 

Spring Break

4/3

Ch. 11: Establishing a pay structure

Ch. 13: Providing employee benefits

 

Bonuses and bailouts

   1. Members of financial organizations that    

       received government bailouts funded through

       tax-payer dollars should have given back their

       bonuses.

   2. Bonuses are a legitimate form of pay in these

       companies, given for work performed, so

       employees were right to keep them.

 

4/104/17

Ch. 12: Recognizing employee contributions with

pay

 

Gender and pay

   1. In 1970, women were paid roughly 60-cents for

       every dollar earned by men. Now they receive

        roughly 80-cents. The gap is closing, and that

        is good for women and the economy.

     2. A significant gap still remains, and that is bad for

         women and the economy.

 

4/24

Ch. 10: Separating and retaining employees

 

Retirement

   1. According to the government, full retirement age,

        which was 65 for many years, will move to 67

        for anyone born after 1959. People are living

        longer, healthier lives and are able to work at

        older ages, so the government should raise full

        retirement age again for people born after 1975.

    2. Raising full retirement age results in people

        working at older ages. This poses a potential

        safety risk, and it also punishes workers who

        want to be able to enjoy retirement at the same

        age their parents could. So, government should

        not raise full retirement age.

 

5/1

Ch. 14: Collective bargaining and labor relations

Ch. 15: Managing HR globally

 

 

Unions

   1. Current employment law is such that

       organized labor is no longer needed to

       protect US workers with respect to either their

      safety or their power at work.

    2. Current employment law is insufficient to

        protect US workers’ safety and work power, so workers

        must have the opportunity to organize in a way

        that affords them protective power

 

5/8

Final Exam

 

 

 

Application papers

 

Application papers involve the application of the debate topic to a real world setting. These applications will be found in news reports. There are 11 debates, so 11 possible opportunities to turn in an application paper. You will choose 7 topics, and hand in 7 papers.

 

Applications can be recent or historic news, but they cannot be outdated unless you also bring the most recent update to the story. You will write a brief (< 1 page) description of the news report, including a citation noting where you found it. You will use your news report to help generate discussion on the related debate topic.  

 

I will collect application papers before the debates begin, so if you need your own copy in order to share during class, then bring two copies.

 

Debates

 

Students will work in pairs or groups to research and present the debate topic. Each pair/group is responsible for both sides of the debate. Groups must present an outline of their debate to me and to the rest of the class with major points and citations included. Groups may use visual aids (e.g., Power Point, videos, still images, etc.) during their presentations.

 

Plan a 15-20 minute presentation for each side, resulting in 30-40 minutes for your formal presentation. We will also have approximately 30 minutes for class discussion, depending on the number of application papers being discussed.

 

Your task will be to convince the class of the veracity of each side of the debate. Thus, you should prepare for each side as though it is the truth.

 

You will be graded on your research and your presentation. Your research must be informative, demonstrating clear evidence of a thorough understanding of the topic. You must use legitimate sources that provide clear support for the position. Cite your sources during your presentation.

 

Your presentation must be professional. Professional dress is not necessary, but you must show evidence of knowledge. You may use note cards as aids, but you may not read directly from them. You must speak clearly with sufficient volume for the classroom. Each group member must speak during the presentation to a sufficient degree that I am able to assess her or his knowledge. If one group member is quiet, that group member will either be marked down or will have several direct questions posed by me that she or he must answer.

 

You must clearly articulate each side of the debate and be able to address comments and questions posed by members of the audience.

 

You will be graded on the following scale:

 

 1-10 points – Presentation shows an overall lack of knowledge of the issue, no preparatory

                       work, lack of research effort

11-25 points –             Presentation shows average understanding of topic, mediocre amount of

                                    preparation, mid-level research effort

26-30 points –             Presentation shows above average understanding of topic, good preparation and

                       good research effort

31-40 points –             Presentation shows an outstanding knowledge of the issue, thorough preparation,

                       exceptional research effort

                                  

                                   

 

 

Document Actions