raymond craig
associate professor
department of english

english 6/75053 writing technologies

 

seminar description ::

In 1984, Apple Computer introduced the Macintosh and announced the Apple University Consortium (ACU). The Consortium was ostensibly a development engine, but also served as the distribution arm of Apple, bringing tens of thousands of computers into the writing programs of selected universities. Since (at least) that time, the computer has been seen as a vehicle for enhanced literacy learning at all levels of schooling, and, I would argue, is now seen as indispensable to schooling now some 25 years after the personal computer. While computers may indeed be “indispensable” in our classrooms and in our world, we are still debating the effects of this change in writing technology and technology-enhanced pedagogical practice. We will aim to inform ourselves as to the nature of the debate through acquaintance with the philosophy of technology and technological change, through an examination of writing technologies both present and historical, through evaluations of various socio-cultural reactions to changes in writing technologies, and through critique of various contemporary claims about the impact of changing writing technologies in university writing programs as well as “writing in the wild.” Students will be encouraged to conduct basic research that tests contemporary claims about writing technologies and literate practice.

texts ::

  • Haas, C. (1996). Writing technologies: Studies on the materiality of literacy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Bijker, Wiebe E. (1997, 1995). Of bicycles, bakelites, and bulbs: Toward a theory of sociotechnical change. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Takayoshi, Pamela & Patricia Sullivan, eds. (2006). Labor, writing technologies, and the shaping of composition in the academy. Hampton Press.
  • (Recommended) APA Publication Manual
  • Extensive additional materials, either in PDF or through a url, will be provided through the Vista site for this course.

seminar requirements ::
reflections, position papers, critiques, and seminar presentations will account for 40% of final seminar grade. a final project, including proposal, draft, final paper and a presentation based on that final project, 60%.

©raymond craig :: department of english :: p.o. box 5190 :: kent state university :: kent, oh 44242