IAKM 60006 Spring 2006 Acar
IAKM 60006
13517 - Acar
STRATEGIC INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
Spring 2006
_________________
INSTRUCTOR Dr. W. Acar, A413 BSA, 672-1156 Home: 673-6514
E-mail: wacar@kent.edu
Office hours: M-W 1:30-3:30 pm & 5:00-5:30, and by appointment.
Class Time & Location: 7:20-10:00 at 115 SFH
TEXT E. Turban, E. McLean & J. Wetherbe:
Information Technology for Management: Transforming Business in the Digital Economy
(Wiley, 3rd edition, 2002) ISBN 0-471-40075-0
COURSE OBJECTIVES
This conceptual course is intended to introduce IAKM students to the principal concepts of strategic information management, as well as to sensitize them to implementation issues in this age of increasing globalization. Information is a uniquely privileged resource, one that is not consumable. We will work together so that you will come to see that, it behooves firms to better manage their informational resources and Internet connection in this Information Age.
COURSE PREREQUISITES
This course assumes that you are admissible to graduate-level courses at KSU. In order not to risk deregistration, in case of doubt please check with your college’s or school’s graduate office.
COURSE PRINCIPLES
As with any growing field, of late our expectations of the information revolution have grown exponentially. This course aims at sharpening your conceptual skills with regard to the theories of strategic and managerial decision making, while keeping an eye on the ethical side, so as to provide you a critical, balanced perspective that could guide you in a future career of information-resource manager or consultant.
OVERLAP WITH OTHER COURSES
Many of the materials used in this course overlap with those used by other instructors. In particular, there may be a duplication of materials with the IAKM 60005 course Information Technology. However, these two courses differ in that IAKM 60005 is meant primarily to address the technical side of knowledge management, while IAKM 60006 is primarily on the ways to interpret information for management purposes.
COURSE PROCEDURE
The TM&W text is very rich and complete. However, its structure is more that of an enclyclopaedia or a dictionary than a thematic text. It can serve as a rich source of (direct and indirect) background references for your term papers. Due to this, my lectures will focus on a subset of the text so as to present a clearly linked sequence of topics. Also, I will complement it in the areas of strategic theory and decision making.
This type of course cannot be ingested passively, but requires your active participation in and before class. This will render the course more rather than less interesting, since what you get out of a course is in direct relation to the effort that goes into it. Students will organize themselves into teams of 3-4 people (our version of "quality circles") for class and project preparation, as well as class discussion. More importantly, the class discussion is an integral part of this course. Meet with your team members outside class hours and bring your ideas to class! Students will be expected to reflect on their readings from the following four sources:
i) The theories and rationales found in the textbook or presented in class.
ii) The theoretical knowledge derived from your other courses.
iii) Information gleaned from keeping up with professional business or IT readings.
iv) General knowledge gleaned from your prior organizational experience.
CLASS ATTENDANCE & PARTICIPATION
An interactive class presupposes beforehand preparation and regular attendance. A 90% attendance rate will allow you to make allowance for emergencies. In such eventuality, do not call your instructor; simply ask your quality-circle teammates to take notes for you.
GRADING
Individual class participation will be counted toward 20% of the grade, the remaining 80% being divided among three group papers with the following value:
· Paper I: 10 pts
· Paper II: 25 pts
· Paper III: 45 pts
Paper I is a short paper (3 pages, 1000 words or so, 1.5 spacing, with a clear highlighting of the headings and spacing around them) in which each group describes, in a few well-structured paragraphs, what it estimates the main issues in SIM (strategic information management) to be. As this is done very early in the course, you will have to rely on general knowledge, not yet the textbook. My feedback will consist of substantive and writing pointers.
Paper II is a substantial paper (a dozen pages, approximately 5000 words, 1.5 spacing, with a clear highlighting of the headings and spacing around them). By then you will have seen the internal management of corporations and e-commerce, but not how to seek external strategic information. This first major paper will have to present your group’s sense of how to manage the information in a corporation (including some consideration of ethical questions), but also to extrapolate from what you know to how you would seek to manage the firm’s environmental scanning and external connections.
* Team members should complement each other. It would be wasteful or even infeasible for them to duplicate each other's work. To provide for greater choice and flexibility, teammates do not all have to end up with the same grade. Each team member will be evaluated by his or her peers by means of the division of a pie of 10 points (or 1.00 in decimal notation) in among the team members [see attached example]. This will allow the instruction will derive a multiplier to scale the group grade up or down for each individual according to his/her peer review.
* Alternatively, groups who unanimously make this choice may simply submit together a sheet signed by all members listing EACH person's percentage contribution to the group work.
Paper III Instructions for paper III will be given in light of paper II.
The final grading will conform to (or possibly be more lenient than) the following numeric scale conversion: A = [90-100], B = [80-89], C = [70-79], D = [60-69], F < 60.
OPTIONAL PRESENTATIONS
To allow the students to participate even in designing the course contents, extra credit can be earned through class presentations approved by the instructor (maximum: 2 presentations per student).
. Individual presentation : 3 extra points.
. Group presentation : 2 extra points for each presenter.
STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
University policy 3342-3-18 requires that students with disabilities be provided reasonable accommodations to ensure their equal access equal access course content. If you have documented disability and require accommodations, please contact the instructor at the beginning of the semester to make arrangements for necessary classroom adjustments. Please note, you must first verify your eligibility for these through the Student Disability Services (contact 330-672-3391 or visit www.kent.edu/sds for more information on registration procedures).
ACADEMIC HONESTY
Plagiarism is the misrepresentation of the source, nature or conditions of one’s academic work. The use of the intellectual property of others without giving them due credit is considered a serious academic offense. Also, cheating occurs when two or more people cooperate in such misrepresentations. It is the University’s policy that cheating or plagiarism results in receiving a failing grade for the work or course. Repeat offenses result in dismissal from the University.
NOTE Papers should be turned in at the beginning of the class in which they are due. Class absences due to working on late papers will not be excused.
LAST DATE TO WITHDRAW 26 March 2006
Dr W. Acar 16 January 2006
TENTATIVE
COURSE CALENDAR
INTRODUCTION TO THE COURSE
1/18 - Presentation of the course and the text
- Distinguishing theory from practice; conceptual courses from hands-on courses
- Organization into groups
- Discussion of students’ expectations
- Introduction to Strategic Management and Organization Theory
SYNOPSIS OF STRATEGIC THINKING AND MANAGERIAL DECISION MAKING
1/25 - Strategic management and organization theory: contrast and complementation [instructor].
- The notion of competitive advantage [instructor]
- Information and competitive advantage [TM&W ch 1 and throughout the book]
- Businesses, corporations and SBUs [instructor]
- Porter’s generic strategies [TM&W p. 91]
- The value chain of productive activities [TM&W pp. 96-99].
2/1 - Data, information and knowledge [TM&W 48-49]
- Managers and decision making [pp. 434-437]
- Decision making and modelling [pp. 438-440]
- Automating the information flows through IT [pp. 441-445]
- Decision-support systems (DSS) [TM&W pp. 446-454]
- Enterprise (ESS) and web-based decision-support systems [455-475].
- Paper I due.
THE (CURRENT) STATE OF THE ART
2/8 - Classification of information systems [TM&W pp. 49-56]
- Operational, managerial and strategic systems [pp. 58-61]
- Information infrastructure and architecture [pp. 62-67]
- Web-based systems [pp. 68-70]
- Managing information resources [pp. 71-79]
- Strategic advantage and information technology (IT) [TM&W pp. 81-89].
- SIS frameworks [pp. 99-102]
- Web-based SISs [pp. 102-105]
- Examples of the impact of an SIS in global competition [106-113].
2/15 - Data management [TM&W pp. 477-486]
- Data Warehousing [pp. 486-491]
- Data analysis & mining [pp. 491-497]
- Data visualization technologies [pp. 498-507]
- Marketing databases [pp. 507-510]
- Web-based data management systems [pp. 510-519]
- Intelligent systems and artificial intelligence [TM&W pp. 522-529]
- Expert systems [pp. 530-537]
- Other intelligent systems from voice understanding to neural computing [538-546]
- Intelligent agents [pp. 547-553]
- Supporting creativity [pp. 554-563].
THE INTERNAL MANAGEMENT OF CORPORATIONS
2/22 - Supply-chain management [TM&W pp. 240-250]
- MRP, MRP II, ERP and SCM [pp. 250-260]
- Electronic commerce and SCM [pp. 261-274]
- Functional information systems [TM&W pp. 277-280]
- Transaction-processing information systems [pp. 281-287].
- Customer-relationships management [pp. 314-323]
- Integrating Functional information systems [pp. 323-333].
3/1 - The need for business process reengineering (BPR) [TM&W pp. 359-365]
- Restructuring processes and organizations [pp. 365-371]
- Network and virtual organizations [pp. 372-384]
- Introduction to knowledge management (KM) [TM&W 386-393]
- The KM process [pp. 394-399]
- KM systems implementation [pp. 399-405]
- The role of IT in KM [406-414]
- Managing KM systems [pp. 415-430].
NETWORK COMPUTING AND E-COMMERCE
3/8 - Network computing [TM&W pp. 121-134]
- Network-based communications [pp. 135-140]
- Network-based collaboration [pp. 140-148]
- Foundations of electronic commerce (EC) [TM&W pp. 168-174]
- Direct retail marketing and advertising [pp. 175-186]
- Consumer behavior, market research and customer support [pp. 187-191].
3/15 - Business-to-business (B2B) applications [TM&W pp. 191-196]
- Using EC in service industries [pp. 196-204]
- M-commerce, auctions and other applications [pp. 205-211]
- Electronic data interchange (EDI), extranets and e-payments [pp. 212-235]
- Innovative IT and web applications in the functional areas [pp. 287-314]
- IT planning and BPR [p. 335-341]
- SIS planning [pp. 342-350]
- Planning IT architectures [pp. 351-356]
- Planning for web-based systems [pp. 356-359].
3/22 SPRING RECESS WEEK – No class
3/29 Inter-group Project Workshop toward Paper II
4/5 - Information Technology Economics [TM&W ch. 13]
- Paper II due.
4/12 - Managing information resources and IT Ethics [TM&W ch. 15 & App. 1.1]
4/19 Intra-group Project Workshop toward Paper III
4/26 - Impact of IT on organizations, individuals and society [TM&W ch. 16]
5/3 - Student Presentations
- Paper III due.
5/10 - OPEN AGENDA.
SIM - Dr W. Acar Group #: Full Name:
TEAMMATE EVALUATION
You are to evaluate your team members three different ways. You also can provide individual or personal comments. When evaluating your colleagues, you need to be careful, fair and objective. Base your evaluation on: personal effort/hard work, team cooperation (being present at meetings, working together), leadership, quality of ideas, analytic methodology and teaching teammates.
Evaluation Framework
A. Distribute a pie of 1.00 point among your team members, including yourself, down to the second decimal of a point. Points are to be given on the basis of performance on the joint project work.
B. Rank-order each team member on the basis of the project work (1 the best, 4 the worst). Note: no two members can receive the same ranking.
C. Rank each member’s class participation on a scale of 0-10 (with 10 being high). This time, performance evaluation is relative to all teams and individuals in this class; here it is possible to score everyone high or low or mixed.
Team Members: A B C
1. Harriet SMITH
|
.30 1 9
|
2. Jody BROWN
|
.21 4 5
|
3. Dow JONES
|
.23 3 6
|
4.
|
|
5. (self) John DOE
|
.26 2 7
|
Score of relative Tie-breaking
performance in group ranking on Contribution
project work. project work. to class.
E X A M P L E
This is an example of a “peer review” or “teammate evaluation” sheet, which will serve to determine each student’s personal multiplier. This multiplier will transform the student’s group grade into his or her personal grade for the group projects.