M&IS 34165 Spring 2006 Baker
SYLLABUS
M&IS 34165, SECTION 22526
DYNAMICS OF LEADERSHIP
SPRING 2006
KENT STATE UNIVERSITY
Kent, Ohio
PROFESSOR: Mr. David L. Baker
ROOM: Bowman 224
CLASS TIMES: THURSDAY, 5:30 – 8:15 PM
OFFICE HOURS: TUESDAYS, Noon – 2:00 PM and THURSDAYS, 8:15 – 10:15 PM
College of Business Administration, Room # A427, Fourth Floor, North End of the Building, in the Annex (near the elevator and the small foyer)
E-MAIL: dlbaker1@kent.edu, dlbaker1@gmail.com
Please use them both!
PROFESSOR’S PHONE: 330-672-1144, extension 2 (Voice Mail is 24/7)
DEPARTMENT OFFICE PHONE: 330-672-2750 (Pam Silliman, Senior Secretary)
DEPARTMENT FAX: 330-672-2953
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
This is an upper-level course designed to give the student practical experience in Leadership Principles. The prerequisite for this course is Principles of Management course, M&IS 21463. You must have taken that class prior to being registered in this Dynamics of Leadership course.
The principal method of instruction is casework along with lecture and examination. You will form a team during the first session. This team will be yours for the remainder of the semester. You need to be an active member of the team during group projects and casework. The team has the prerogative of dismissing you from their group if you do not support it by active attendance, work, and participation. At the end of the semester, there will be a peer review by your teammates, which may seriously affect your grade.
At this level of your college career, there should be no prodding by professors to get you to do the work on a daily basis. This class will be run much like a graduate class. However, if the professor sees people not prepared, reading the cases for the first time in class, and holding up their teams, it is possible that your professor may revert to more classical teaching methods, as distasteful as they may be, to make sure that all students are fully prepared.
REQUIRED TEXTS:
There are two texts required:
1. Clawson, James G., Level Three Leadership, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc., 3rd edition, 2006, paperback, 402 pages, ISBN 0131469029, (Hereinafter referred to as “T”, for Textbook)
2. Clawson, James G., Practical Problems in Organizations: Cases in Leadership, Organizational Behavior, and Human Resources, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc., 2003, paperback, 468 pages, ISBN 0130083895, (Hereinafter referred to as “C”, for Casebook)
OBJECTIVES OF THE COURSE: This course is specifically intended to:
1. Introduce you to various leadership models and help you develop your own definition of what it means to be a leader.
2. Introduce you to the related elements of any leadership situation: personal characteristics, strategic thinking, influencing others, designing effective organizations, and managing change.
3. Enable you to clarify your semiconscious values, assumptions, beliefs, and expectations about what it means to be an effective leader and to explore the functionality of those beliefs.
4. Expose you to many excellent authors, both current and historical, who have made significant contributions to the subject of leadership.
5. Assist you to develop skills in influencing others, whether or not you have positional authority.
6. Cause you to reflect on and anticipate places in which (and methods in which) you will develop and extend your leadership during your career and lifetime.
7. Help you to learn practical skills about leadership through experiential exercises.
8. Make it possible for you to anticipate and plan your leadership role within the business world.
9. Prepare you to be a leader in society.
ASSIGNMENTS, PROJECTS, AND EXAMS
Your professor has given you, on the following spreadsheet, a complete listing of the topics and chapters to be covered in each session. This is a breakdown of how these will work:
1. Participation/Attendance: There are two components to this grade. The first, worth 100 points, is a team-based award, determined by the team’s participation in the case discussions. The second part is a team self-evaluation of each individual in the team and his or her contributions to the team effort. This is valued at 50 points.
2. Journal Keeping. You will be asked to keep a journal to record your results and observations of the experiential exercises assigned for many classes. The journals will be collected twice during the semester and reviewed. This counts 50 points total towards your overall grade.
3. Written Case Analyses: For team projects on Case Analyses: You are to prepare each case individually and be prepared to discuss with your team and in larger class session. Participation will be graded by both your teammates and by your professor.
Individually, you must hand in three cases, completely analyzed and typed according to the guidelines set forth in the class. All case questions must be answered as well. Note, this is not in outline format, but descriptive paragraphs using the outline ideas presented in class. You must use the long cycle method on this part. This counts 300 points total, at 100 points each, towards your final grade.
4. Book/Chapter Reviews: This is a very important part of the class. There are so many good books on the market in leadership that it would be impossible to read them all. Thus we will help each other by preparing report(s) on assigned book(s) (or chapters of books) and distributing copies to your classmates. You will do this as a team and make a team presentation on two books throughout the semester. Your classmates will grade you on this one. This is worth 100 points towards your grade and in the team projects you will receive whatever the team gets. There will be individual book/chapter review assignments as well.
5. Movie Reviews: This is a very interesting assignment for each team to review one (1) film on various leadership topics. You will prepare a report and select various clips or segments to show the class, which demonstrates the leadership principles, or lack thereof, to the class. The class will also grade the team on this and additionally it is worth 100 points to the team.
6. Midterm Exam: This will be predominantly an essay test on terms, definitions, and understanding of the subject matter that will be held on the examination date. It will be a blue book type exam, and all work will be done in the classroom, closed book, individually. This will count 100 points towards your final grade. You will have one hour and fifteen minutes for this exam. There will be lecture and possibly some review preceding the exam.
7. Project: You will do a project that will be due by Thursday, April 20th, based on the criteria listed below. This should be not less than five (5) and not more than ten (10) typewritten pages, double spaced, with appropriate footnotes and references, according to proper style. This is worth 100 points towards your grade.
8. Final Exam: This is a case analysis (one, two, or three cases; no choice) that will be held on the examination date. It will be a blue book type exam, and all work will be done in the classroom, closed book, individually. This will count 100 points towards your final grade. You will have two hours and fifteen minutes for this exam.
TESTS:
There will be two exams; a mid-term and a final.
OFFICE HOURS:
Office hours for the semester will be held (tentatively) according to the schedule on page one of this syllabus. Should those dates/times not work for your own calendar please call me to suggest alternative times. It is best to call first for an appointment before just stopping by as I may be with other students or faculty and there could be a bit of a wait. I prefer calls. Leave a message if you must. I check voice mail several times throughout the day but e-mail much less often. If you are having problems in the course, please see me immediately; don’t wait until semester end.
GRADING:
There will be a total of 1,000 points available to determine your grade. The criteria for grading is divided as follows
1. Participation/Attendance: 150 points See Syllabus Calendar
2. Journal Keeping: 50 points See Syllabus Calendar
3. Written Case Analyses: 300 points See Syllabus Calendar
4. Book/Chapter Reviews: 100 points See Syllabus Calendar
5. Movie Reviews: 100 points See Syllabus Calendar
6. Midterm Exam: 100 points March 9
7. Project: 100 points Due no later than 5:30 p.m. on April 20, in class
8. Final Exam: 100 points May 11, 5:45 – 8:00 p.m.; Note the time change
Total: 1,000 points
To determine your percentage grade, divide by ten (10), and then use the following to ascertain your letter grade:
A 100 – 90 points
B 89 – 80
C 79 – 70
D 69 – 60
F Below 60
CLASSROOM DECORUM:
Your professor wishes there to be no eating or chewing gum in class. So as not to disturb others, cell phones must be turned off upon entering the classroom. If a student’s cell phone rings during class or an exam the professor reserves the right to ask that student to leave the room for the remainder of that class period. This is in accordance with the University policy on disruptions in the classroom.
SYLLABUS:
While this is intended to be a strict overview of this course it is not a contract. Things happen; accidents, emergencies, weather conditions, catastrophes, and the like, and this syllabus is therefore tentative. As leaders you need to be flexible to change and understanding of that dynamic. Your professor will give as much lead time as possible on all changes, so that you have ample time to prepare.
STUDENTS’ ABSENCES, MISSED CLASSES/EXAMS:
Along the same line as things that can happen above, your professor realizes that circumstances may occur in your schedule as well that could preclude your attendance for class activities, such as work commitments and travel out of town, family emergencies/events, accidents, etc. Accommodation will be offered whenever possible and practicable, however, advance notice to me will generally be required. Makeups will be available for the two exams only. It is not realistic to come to me after the exam and explain a situation, other than a dire emergency, and expect to have a makeup exam. Other arrangements need to be provided for all other activities.
PROJECT TOPICS:
The following topics are allowed for your term project: please pick one from these. If you wish to offer alternative leadership topics, I will be happy to hear, discuss, and consider them:
1. Compare and contrast leadership styles from the 18th, 19th, and 20th centuries. Give solid examples of each era and the implications for leaders in the 21st century. How do you account for these changes, and why?
2. Shadow and interview a major leader in a non-profit or charitable/volunteer organization. What makes this person influence people so well? What implications are there for leaders both in this organization and in others?
3. Compare and contrast leadership styles in the military over the past one hundred and fifty (150) years. Where do you see that this is heading and what are the implications for future military leaders?
4. Develop your own personal Leadership Model as explained in T, pp. 303-339. What are your own goals, direction, and timetable for achieving these activities?
PRESENTATION SKILLS:
The ability to properly present topics of importance to your classmates, colleagues, clients, stakeholders, and supervisors is essential in both life and the business world. It is possible that, shall time permit, we will do some exercises in this vital area. You will each be expected to present to the class, both individually and within teams, sometime during this semester. Please contact me early on in this course should you have any questions or concerns about presenting.
THE FOLLOWING POLICIES APPLY TO ALL STUDENTS IN THIS COURSE:
A. Students attending the course who do not have the proper prerequisite risk being deregistered from the class.
B. Students have responsibility to ensure they are properly enrolled in classes. You are advised to review your official class schedule (using Web for Students) during the first two weeks of the semester to ensure you are properly enrolled in this class and section. Should you find an error in your class schedule, you have until Friday, January 27, 2006 to correct the error with your advising office. If registration errors are not corrected by this date and you continue to attend and participate in classes for which you are not officially enrolled, you are advised now that you will not receive a grade at the conclusion of the semester for any class in which you are not properly registered.
C. Academic Honesty: Cheating means to misrepresent the source, nature, or other conditions of your academic work (e.g., tests, papers, projects, assignments) so as to get undeserved credit. In addition, it is considered to be cheating when one cooperates with someone else in any such misrepresentation. The use of the intellectual property of others without giving them appropriate credit is a serious academic offense. It is the University's policy that cheating or plagiarism result in receiving a failing grade for the work or course. Repeat offenses result in dismissal from the University.
D. For Spring 2006, the course withdrawal deadline is Sunday, March 26, 2006. Withdrawal before the deadline results in a "W" on the official transcript; after the deadline a grade must be calculated and reported.
E. Students with disabilities: In accordance with University policy (3321-3-18), if you have a documented disability and require accommodations to obtain equal access in this course, please contact the instructor at the beginning of the semester or when given an assignment for which an accommodation is required. Students with disabilities must verify their eligibility through the Office of Student Disability Services (SDS) in the Michael Schwartz Service Center (contact 330-672-3391, or visit www.kent.edu/sds for more information on registration procedures).
Tentative Weekly Assignment Schedule for Dynamics of Leadership
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date
|
|
Content of Class
|
Case #
|
Assignments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 1
|
Jan. 19
|
Introduction
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
How to Analyze Cases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theories of Leadership
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 2
|
Jan. 26
|
|
The Changing Context of
|
|
Ch. 1 & 2, T
|
|
|
|
|
Leadership
|
Case 2
|
Paragon Corp. & Its Flight Dept.
|
|
|
|
|
Theories of Leadership
|
|
Theories of Leadership, T, p 325.
|
|
|
|
|
Team 1 - 12 Angry Men (v)
|
|
|
|
Case Questions:
|
|
|
|
|
||
1. What are the issues here?
|
|
|
|
|||
2. What should we do at NAFC?
|
|
|
||||
3. What should we do at EFC?
|
|
|
|
|||
4. What should we do at AFC?
|
|
|
|
|||
5. What should we do on corporate relations?
|
|
|
||||
6. What should we do with David?
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 3
|
Feb. 2
|
|
A General Model of Leadership
|
|
Ch. 3, T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 6
|
The Life and Career of a Senior
|
|
|
|
|
Team 6 - Book Review
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case Questions:
|
|
|
|
|
||
1. What does it mean to be successful?
|
|
|
||||
2. Describe Tom & Judy's careers, lives, and relationships in parallel to each other.
|
|
|||||
3. What stages or issues do you anticipate facing in your life and career?
|
|
|||||
4. What do you like about these people?
|
|
|
||||
5. What about these people leave you a little flat?
|
|
|
||||
Session 4
|
Feb. 9
|
|
Levels of Leadership
|
|
Ch. 4 & 6, T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 3
|
John Wolford A
|
|
|
|
|
Team 5 Book Review
|
|
Personal Defense Mech., T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 1
|
Will be added later in course
|
|
Case Questions:
|
|
|
|
First Written Case due
|
||
1. What are the issues here?
|
|
|
|
|||
2. Why does John behave the way he does?
|
|
|
||||
3. If you were in Lutz's position, what would you do and why?
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 5
|
Feb. 16
|
|
The Moral Foundation of
|
|
Ch. 5, T
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary Leadership
|
Case 30
|
Jerry Caldwell at MOEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team 2 - Wall Street (V)
|
|
Moral Foundation, T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case Questions:
|
|
|
|
|
||
1.What are the issues here?
|
|
|
|
|||
2. What kind of system changes would address the problems at MOEX?
|
|
|||||
3. What should Fairbanks do?
|
|
|
|
|||
4. What is the difference between Jeff Fairbanks and Raeford Marshall? And what is the impact
|
||||||
on the firm of both their behaviors?
|
|
|
||||
5. After reviewing the B case, what is your assessment of the plan Fairbanks proposes? Why?
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 6
|
Feb. 23
|
|
Six Steps to Effective Leadership
|
|
Ch. 7, T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 33
|
Louis Gerstner and Lotus Development
|
|
|
|
|
Team 4 - Who Says Elephants
|
|
LSA Assessment
|
|
|
|
|
Can't Dance (Book Review)
|
|
|
|
Case Questions:
|
|
|
|
|
||
1. What strategic challenges do you see facing the IBM/Lotus merger?
|
|
|||||
2. If you were in Mr. Manzi's position, what objectives would you have?
|
|
|
||||
3. If you were in Mr. Gerstner's position, what objectives would you have for the meeting?
|
||||||
4. If you were in Mr. Gerstner's position, what would you say to the Lotus employees?
|
||||||
5. What do you predict will happen in this new entity?
|
|
|
||||
Session 7
|
Mar. 2
|
|
Leadership and Intelligence
|
|
Ch. 8 T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 4
|
Hassan Shahrasebi: The Golden
|
|
|
|
|
Team 3 - Citizen Kane (V)
|
|
Boy
|
|
Case Questions:
|
|
|
|
Emotional Intelligence
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Second Written Case Due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Have any of you ever met a person like Hassan?
|
|
|
||||
2. Is Hassan a workaholic? Why? Why not? Is there such a thing? Why does Hassan behave
|
||||||
like he does?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. If you were Hassan's boss what would you do and why?
|
|
|
||||
4. Can corporations become addictive? What are the symptoms? What can one do about it?
|
||||||
5. What conclusions can you draw from this case?
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 8
|
Mar. 9
|
|
Mid Term Examination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 9
|
Mar. 16
|
|
Resonance, Leadership, and the
|
|
Ch. 9, T
|
|
|
|
|
Purpose of Life
|
Case 10
|
Phil Charles A, B, C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life's Dream Exercise, T, p. 358
|
|
|
|
|
Joshua Chamberlain at Gettysburg
|
|
|
|
Case Questions:
|
|
|
|
|
||
1. What is Phil's Story?
|
|
|
|
|
||
2. What is your story?
|
|
|
|
|
||
3. What are the key elements that you can learn from in your story?
|
|
|
||||
4. What should Phil do?
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 10
|
Mar. 23
|
|
Finding Your Dream
|
|
Ch. 18 T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 5
|
Jackie Woods (A)
|
|
|
|
|
Team 4 - Dead Poet's Society (V)
|
|
Life's Story, T, p. 354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Journal Collected
|
|
Case Questions:
|
|
|
|
|
||
1.What forces are tugging at Jackie? What are her options? What are the potential consequences
|
||||||
(and for whom) of each of those options?
|
|
|
||||
2. What aspects of Jackie's life and career do you find interesting? Why?
|
|
|||||
3. What would you do if you were in her situation? Why?
|
|
|
||||
4. What kind of person is Jackie? Is she a leader? Why? What does she do that is leaderly?
|
||||||
How would you assess her leadership style?
|
|
|
||||
5. What if Jackie were actually Jack? What information in the case will need to be changed to fit
|
||||||
a (perhaps stereotypical) male lead character?
|
|
|
||||
6. Is Jackie's style a woman's style? In what specific ways is her style similar to and different from
|
||||||
that of Cal Turner of Dollar General -- and others we have encountered in this course?
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Class
|
|
|
Mar. 27 - Apr. 2 Spring Break
|
|
Study Hard! Enjoy!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 11
|
Apr. 6
|
|
Strategic Thinking
|
|
Ch. 10, T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 16
|
Stewart Glapat Corp. vs. Caljan (A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Written Case Due
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case Questions:
|
|
|
|
|
||
1. What are the competitive advantages of the "Adjustoveyer"? What features of the company have contributed to this?
|
||||||
2. How serious is the threat from Caljan in 1992?
|
|
|
||||
3. What are the strengths and weaknesses of Stewart-Glapat and Caljan, and which company is best suited to win
|
||||||
in this competition?
|
|
|
|
|
||
4. How should Bill Stewart respond to the Caljan threat? That is, if you were in Bill's position, or consulting to him
|
||||||
what would you do or recommend?
|
|
|
||||
5. How do you assess the future potential of Stewart-Glapat's business?
|
|
|||||
Session 12
|
Apr. 13
|
|
Leading Others
|
|
Ch. 12, T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 19
|
Great Expectations (A)
|
|
|
|
|
Team 3 - Book Review
|
|
Survey of Mgt. Style, T, p. 313
|
|
Case Questions:
|
|
|
|
|
||
1. What are the pressures working on Mr. Hiraki?
|
|
|
||||
2. If you were in Mr. Hiraki's position, how would you have handled each of the incidents in the case?
|
||||||
3. What would do at the end of the case? What would you expect the consequences of your actions
|
||||||
to be?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 13
|
Apr. 20
|
|
Leading Teams
|
|
Ch. 13, T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 22
|
Making the Tough Team Call (A)
|
|
|
|
|
Team 2 - Book Review
|
|
Team Self Assessment, T
|
|
Case Questions:
|
|
|
|
|
||
1. How many of you have been a part of a development program for high potential
|
||||||
managers?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. If you were in Dammerman's situation, what issues are on your mind?
|
|
|||||
3. What options does Dammerman have?
|
|
|
||||
4. If you decide to pull the project, how do you go about it?
|
|
|
||||
5. If you decide to intervene, how do you go about it?
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 14
|
Apr. 27
|
|
Leading Org. Design
|
|
Ch. 14, 17 T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 24
|
FMC Aberdeen
|
|
|
|
|
Team 6 - Twelve O’clock High(V)
|
|
Systems and Processes that need
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redesigning, T, p. 310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leading Teams, Conclusion
Final Project Due
|
|
Case Questions:
|
|
|
|
|
||
1. Does this organization work?
|
|
|
||||
2. Why does the Aberdeen facility work, that is what contributes to its outcomes?
|
|
|||||
3. What features of the Aberdeen approach do you find surprising?
|
|
|
||||
4. What, if any, of these design components would be transferable to another organization?
|
||||||
5. If you were in Mr. Dailey's position, what would you do and why?
|
|
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Session 15
|
May 4
|
|
Leading Change
|
|
Ch. 15, 16 T
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case 39
|
Big Sky, Inc.: The Magasco Paper
|
|
|
|
|
Team 1 - Book Review
|
|
Mill (A)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Journal Turned In.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leading Organizational Design, Leading Change, T
|
|
Case Questions
|
|
|
|
|
||
1. How did the Magasco situation evolve? What were the major contributing factors?
|
||||||
2. How did the long-standing papermaking culture affect the situation?
|
|
|
||||
3. What vision would you create for Magasco for the five years? Why?
|
|
|
||||
4. What actions would you take as the work force approaches from the gate?
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 11
|
|
Final Exam
|
|
5:45 – 8:00 p.m., NOTE the time change!
|
|